MedPath

Live Stream of Prehospital point-of Care Ultrasound by Air Rescue Physicians

Withdrawn
Conditions
Echocardiography
Telemedicine
Interventions
Other: Point-of-care ultrasound with tele-supervision
Other: Point-of-care ultrasound without tele-supervision
Registration Number
NCT04810520
Lead Sponsor
Medical University of Vienna
Brief Summary

Background: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has been suggested as a useful tool in emergency medicine for diagnosis and treatment of reversible causes. However, in prehospital setting performing ultrasound and the translation of the findings can be challenging. As new prehospital ultrasound devices offer the possibility for remote supervision, the impact of tele-supervision on time to diagnosis of critically ill patients is unclear.

Aims: The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of tele-supervision on the time of POCUS in prehospital critically ill patients by air rescue physicians.

Methods: In total 100 critically ill patients suffering from acute dyspnoea, circulatory failure or trauma, which are treated by air rescue physicians will be included in this study. Duration of ultrasound performance as well as altered treatment strategies will be analyzed.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
WITHDRAWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
Not specified
Inclusion Criteria

Critically ill patients suffering from acute dyspnoea, circulatory failure or trauma will be included.

Patients with acute dyspnoea will be included, if they show at least one of the two following signs of respiratory failure:

  • Respiratory rate > 20 breaths per minute
  • Peripheral oxygen saturation without oxygen supplementation < 90%

Patients with acute circulatory failure will be included, if they show at least one of the following signs:

  • Hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90mmHg)
  • Altered tissue perfusion (cold, clammy, mottling skin or altered mental status)

Trauma patients will be included, if at least one cause is suspected:

  • Intraabdominal fluid
  • Intrathoracic free fluid
  • Pneumothorax
Exclusion Criteria
  • age under 18
  • if POCUS will lead to a delay of live-saving treatment or transportation

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Point-of-care ultrasound with tele-supervisionPoint-of-care ultrasound with tele-supervisionPoint-of-care ultrasound of critically ill patients (acute dyspnoea, circulatory failure, trauma) will be performed with tele-supervision.
Point-of-care ultrasound without tele-supervisionPoint-of-care ultrasound without tele-supervisionPoint-of-care ultrasound of critically ill patients (acute dyspnoea, circulatory failure, trauma) will be performed without tele-supervision.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Duration of prehospital ultrasound between POCUS with or without tele-supervisionthrough study completion, an average of 1 year

duration of prehospital ultrasound between POCUS with tele-supervision and POCUS without tele-supervision in critically ill patients (acute dyspnoea, circulatory failure, trauma).

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Alteration of treatent strategiesthrough study completion, an average of 1 year

Investigating the impact of POCUS with tele-supervision in comparison to POCUS without tele-supervision on alteration of treatment strategies.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Medical University of Vienna, Department of Anaesthesia & General Intensive Care

🇦🇹

Vienna, Austria

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath