Effects of Vitamin D and Omega-3 on Cerebrovascular Disease

Not Applicable

Completed

Conditions: Vitamin D
Stroke

Interventions: Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D
Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D placebo
Drug: Fish oil placebo
Drug: Fish oil

Registration Number: NCT04070833

Lead Sponsor: Brigham and Women's Hospital

Brief Summary: The VITamin D and OmegA-3 TriaL (VITAL; NCT 01169259) is a completed randomized clinical trial in 25,875 U.S. men and women which investigated whether taking daily dietary supplements of vitamin D3 (2000 IU) or omega-3 fatty acids (Omacor® fish oil, 1 gram) reduced the risk of developing cancer, heart disease, and stroke in people who do not have a prior history of these illnesses. Observational follow-up of participants is currently ongoing. The current study is being conducted among participants in VITAL who experience a stroke event during follow-up and will examine whether vitamin D or omega-3 fatty acid supplementation impact post-stroke outcomes.

Detailed Description: Stroke is a leading cause of disability and death worldwide and is expected to become an even more prevalent cause of disability in the future as the population ages. Understanding risk factors which may prospectively influence stroke outcomes may help to reduce the morbidity burden of stroke.

The VITamin D and OmegA-3 TriaL (VITAL) examined the impact of vitamin D3 (2,000 IU/day cholecalciferol) and omega-3 fatty acids (840 mg eicosapentaenoic acid \[EPA\] + docosahexaenoic acid \[DHA\]) on stroke incidence. However, the parent trial did not examine the impact of these supplements on stroke outcomes. Even if they do not significantly reduce stroke incidence, these supplements may still reduce stroke severity and improve outcomes post-stroke. Given the high morbidity burden of stroke, the impact of these supplements on stroke outcomes is of substantial scientific and public health importance.

The first aim of this study is to test whether vitamin D3 or omega-3 fatty acid supplementation reduces the risk of poor functional outcomes as measured at hospital discharge and 6- and 12-months post-stroke. The second aim is to determine whether chronic cerebrovascular changes (white matter hyperintensity volume and cerebral microbleeds) mediate the effect of vitamin D3 or omega-3 fatty acid supplementation on stroke outcomes.

Individuals enrolled in VITAL who experience a non-fatal stroke event will be mailed additional questionnaires assessing functional limitations, physical disability, and social disability. Responses from these questionnaires will be used to determine the effect of vitamin D3 or omega-3 fatty acid supplementation on post-stroke outcomes.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status: COMPLETED

Sex: All

Target Recruitment: 290

Inclusion Criteria

Participants eligible and willing to participate in the main VITAL trial (NCT 01169259) who experience a stroke during follow-up.

Exclusion Criteria

Participants eligible and willing to participate in the main VITAL trial (NCT 01169259) who do not experience a stroke during follow-up.

Study & Design

Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL

Study Design: FACTORIAL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Vitamin D + fish oil	Vitamin D	-
Vitamin D placebo + fish oil placebo	Vitamin D placebo	-
Vitamin D placebo + fish oil	Vitamin D placebo	-
Vitamin D placebo + fish oil placebo	Fish oil placebo	-
Vitamin D + fish oil placebo	Vitamin D	-
Vitamin D + fish oil placebo	Fish oil placebo	-
Vitamin D + fish oil	Fish oil	-
Vitamin D placebo + fish oil	Fish oil	-

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Number of Participants With Poor Stroke Outcome at Hospital Discharge as Measured by the Modified Rankin Scale (mR 3-6)	1 day	modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at hospital discharge The mRS is often seen as a measure of disability or a "global health index" due to its strong emphasis on mobility although it claims to be a measure of handicap. The mRS is a seven-point scale (0=no symptoms at all; 1=no significant disability despite symptoms; 2=slight disability; 3=moderate disability; 4=moderately severe disability; 5=severe disability; 6=death). To avoid issues with model convergence due to sparse data, I will a priori categorize the mRS into good (mRS 0-2) versus poor (mRS 3-6) outcomes. These data were collected during the parent study (NCT01169259)
Number of Participants With at Least One Functional Limitation After Stroke According to the Scale Adapted From Nagi	1 year	Functional limitations will be assessed through self-report using the physical performance scale adapted from Nagi. The adapted Nagi scale asks respondents if they experience any limitations in each of the following items: pulling or pushing large objects; stooping, crouching, or kneeling; reaching or extending arms above shoulder level; reaching or extending arms below shoulder level; writing or handling or fingering small objects; standing in one place for long periods; and sitting for an hour. Participants reporting a limitation in any of these items will be considered to have at least one functional limitation after stroke.
Number of Participants With a Physical Disability After Stroke as Measured by the Modified Katz Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Scale	1 year	The modified Katz ADL scale ask participants to self-report if they need needing help with any of the following items: bathing; dressing; eating; getting in and out of a chair; and walking 50 yards. Individuals who report needing help with any of those items will be considered to have a physical disability after stroke.
Number of Participants With a Physical Disability After Stroke as Measured by the Rosow-Breslau Functional Health Scale	1 year	The Rosow-Breslau Functional Health Scale asks participants to self-report if they need help with any of the following tasks: walking 0.5 mile; walking up and down stairs to the second floor; and doing heavy work around the house. Individuals who report needing help with any of those tasks will be considered to have a physical disability after stroke.
Number of Participants With Social Disability After Stroke as Measured by FHS Social Disability Scale	1 year	Social disability was assessed through a self-administered questionnaire which asked questions about social functioning developed in the Framingham Heart Study. The scale covers five social areas (housekeeping, transportation, social interaction, food preparation, and grocery shopping). Respondents are grouped into four categories (need met, no apparent problem (best outcome); need met, potential problem; uncertain need met, potential problem; need unmet, current problem (worst outcome)) for each social area using a previously published algorithm. We created summary indices for the total number of unmet needs across all areas and for the total number of unmet needs or uncertain needs met, potential problem. These indices range from 0 to 5, but to avoid problems with model convergence due to sparse data, we will a priori categorize them as 0 (best outcome), 1, or ≥2 (worst outcome).