External DCR Versus Canalicular SI With MMC in NLDO
- Conditions
- Primary Acquired Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction
- Registration Number
- NCT03780868
- Lead Sponsor
- Menoufia University
- Brief Summary
While external DCR is the gold standard procedure for primary NLDO as well as complicated cases, SI with MMC could achieve comparable success rates in primary acquired NLDO, hence should be considered as an alternative as a safe and minimally invasive procedure.
- Detailed Description
Purpose: To compare external dacryocystorhinostomy versus canalicular silicone intubation with the use of Mitomycin C (MMC) in primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO).
Methods: the study was carried out at the department of Ophthalmology, Menoufia university Hospital, Egypt, between June 2012 to July 2014. Fifty-six patients who were diagnosed with primary acquired NLDO. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups: thirty cases underwent external DCR and twenty-six cases underwent silicone intubation with MMC.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 56
- primary acquired NLDO
- All other secondary causes of NLDO
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method external DCR 2 years patency of lacrimal passage was tested by height of tear meniscus and lacrimal syringing. On the basis of subjective and objective evaluation, patients were categorized into three groups: successful surgery (asymptomatic, normal tear meniscus and patent lacrimal system with syringing procedure), improvement (watery eye and/or discharge, moderate tear meniscus and partially patent lacrimal system with syringing procedure with mild regurgitation from the puncta) and failed surgery (watery eye and/or discharge, high tear meniscus and non-patent lacrimal system).
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
