跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03182283
NCT03182283已完成不适用

Person-Centered Psychosis Care: An Educational Intervention for Inpatient Staff

Göteborg University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 100 人开始时间: 2014年4月25日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
100
试验地点
1
主要终点
Change in patient empowerment (between before and after cohorts)

研究概览

简要总结

Schizophrenia is a major mental illness that presents in young adulthood and affects ~1% of the population. Impact on affected persons life is often major and life expectancy is reduced by ~20 years. Better and more effective care models are needed to increase health in these persons. Person-centered care have been suggested to be one way to increase efficiency in care delivery for patients with chronical and complex conditions. The impact of person-centered care on a inpatient psychosis care setting is now being tested.

The purpose of this study is to test whether inpatient Person-centered psychosis care (PCPC) can

  1. increase patient empowerment
  2. improve patient satisfaction
  3. reduce the frequency of involuntary treatments
  4. reduce the duration of inpatient care and
  5. reduce overall ward burden

A further purpose is to qualitatively explore which components in this complex intervention are experienced as facilitators or barriers to the achievement of good care, from both patient, next-of-kin and staff perspectives.

Quantitative data is collected through questionnaires from patients (measuring empowerment, care satisfaction and perceived health) before and after an educational intervention for staff, along with ward level measures such as care burden, number of involuntary treatments and length of stay on ward.

Qualitative interview is used to study experiences of patients, next-of-kin and staff.

详细描述

Background

Schizophrenia is a major mental illness that presents in young adulthood. It affects approximately 1% of the population and is a major cause of Disability-adjusted Life Years worldwide. Besides impacting on the ability to independently carry out daily activities, work/studies and interactions with family and community, the illness has a profound effect on physical health. Diabetes and cardiovascular diseases are common complications and life expectancy is reduced by as much as two decades. The long term nature of this complex illness highlights the need for more effective, holistic care models. Increased patient involvement is central, as it has been shown that patients' views of appropriate interventions often differ from those of formal care providers.

Person-centered care (PCC) is recognized by the WHO as a valuable approach to the care of chronic conditions. A basic assumption of person-centered care (PCC) is that healthcare must recognize the patient as a person, with own knowledge, capacity and preferences along with needs and problems. The PCC way to deal with illness and disease is to form a partnership with the person and together form a plan of action to increase health (i.e. not only focus on symptoms or signs of diagnosed disease) taking into account the person's context and priorities. Previous studies show that persons with serious mental illness can and want to participate in their own care and participation might increase adherence. Improved social function and consumer satisfaction were demonstrated when a person-centered care approach, Integrated Care (IC) was tested in a psychosis outpatient-based randomized controlled trial.

To the best of the authors knowledge, PCC has yet to be tested in an inpatient setting for persons with severe mental illness. Favorable results have been demonstrated with regard to both ward level and patient level outcomes from inpatient settings within somatic care. Person-centered care in geriatric settings, which might share some common issues with hospital care for persons with schizophrenia (decreased cognitive function, lack of insight, compromised autonomy), have shown positive outcomes for QoL and agitation in patients and job satisfaction for staff. Reviews show mixed results though. Thus, we wanted to evaluate an intervention for inpatient psychiatric care for persons with schizophrenia and similar psychoses. To this end, we developed Person-centered Psychosis Care (PCPC), a staff educational intervention involving components of PCC as well as IC. Person Centered Psychosis Care was defined as having four key elements; dialogue, building partnership, formulation and documentation of a health plan, and early involvement of the patient's outpatient facility. The latter means that the patient's outpatient-based social resource group can come into play already during the inpatient stay.

Purpose

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Non Randomized
干预模型
Sequential
主要目的
Health Services Research
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Diagnosis of psychotic illness in accordance with ICD-10
  • Medically ready for discharge as deemed by ward psychiatrist

排除标准

  • Severe cognitive disability
  • Lack of basic Swedish language skills

研究组 & 干预措施

Post-intervention

Other

After staff attended educational intervention and implemented Person-centered psychosis care in the wards all patients admitted will receive person-centered care.

干预措施: Person-centered psychosis care (Behavioral)

Pre-intervention

No Intervention

All patients at the psychosis wards receive care as usual before staff goes through educational intervention.

结局指标

主要结局

Change in patient empowerment (between before and after cohorts)

时间窗: Baseline (for before-intervention cohort), 2 years (for after-intervention cohort)

Patient reported empowerment measured by The Empowerment Scale (Rogers et al 2010).

次要结局

  • Change in consumer satisfaction (between before and after cohorts)(Baseline (for before-intervention cohort), 2 years (for after-intervention cohort))
  • Change in staff care burden (before and after intervention and implementation)(Baseline, 2 years)
  • Change in inpatient days with/out involuntary care (between before and after cohorts)(Baseline (for before-intervention cohort), 2 years (for after-intervention cohort))
  • Change in involuntary treatment (between before and after cohorts)(Baseline (for before-intervention cohort), 2 years (for after-intervention cohort))

研究者

发起方
Göteborg University
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验