Placebo Effect in Children With Attention Deficit Disorder and/or Hyperactivity Disorder
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 入组人数
- 44
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Placebo and nocebo effect on pain
研究概览
简要总结
In Quebec, there has been an important increase of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) diagnosis since 2015. ADHD symptoms, related to behavioural and/or concentration difficulties, are very similar to other disorders symptoms, such as anxiety and depression, and have a significant impact on students' academic success and future life. Adults (parent, teacher, coach) expectations towards a child's abilities are consciously or unconsciously perceived by the child, influence his expectations of his own abilities, and thus his academic performance (Pygmalion effect). The child and his entourage's expectations are therefore a major factor to consider, especially in school-age children. According to ADHD studies, some brain areas involved in pain regulation and in attention cognitive abilities develop at a slower rate in children with ADHD than the other children.
Considering the deleterious consequences generated by the symptoms of this disorder, the research project aims to better understand the role of expectations in children with ADHD in a medical (pain) and school (attention abilities) context. It also aims to contribute to better understand the role of the brain on the expectations effect and ADHD. In this study, children expectations will be modulated while pain experiments and cognitive task will be realized by children with and without ADHD. Brain measures will also be assessed with advanced techniques.
Thus, we hope that the results will help improve intervention strategies in these contexts to ensure better support for children with ADHD, with a distant goal of contributing to the development of stronger tools for differential diagnostics.
详细描述
Attention Deficit with or without Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder that affects 2 to 7% worldwide youth population and 6.2% of children aged 6 to 11 years in Quebec [1-3]. The main symptoms of this disorder are difficulties in regulating behaviour and/or concentration [4]. These difficulties have significant negative consequences in someone's life, particularly in terms of their academic success [5] and has significant negative consequences in the medical context, increasing accidents and mortality risk [6].
Children's academic performance can be modulated by the Pygmalion (or Rosenthal) effect, which refers to an improvement or decrease in an individual's performance depending on the degree of belief in his or her abilities on the part of an authority or the environment [7]. Thus, these beliefs have an influence on a person's expectations of his or her ability to do a task, and thus on final performance [8]. The expectations of an individual and his or her entourage is therefore a major factor to consider, especially in school-age children [9]. Expectations also play an important role in the placebo effect. Whereas a placebo is a treatment without any real influence on a particular condition (drug or therapeutic technique), the placebo effect is the perceived beneficial effect following this treatment. Furthermore, a placebo effect is almost always added to the beneficial effect of a treatment in different ways (for example, an analgesic effect could occur faster or in a shorter delay) and to different degrees [10]. The placebo effect is regularly studied and increasingly understood in the context of pain [11]. Although the perception of pain is influenced by placebo treatment, this effect is itself modulated by the expectations of the person in pain [12]. The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is an essential region for the placebo's mechanism of action [10]. In children with ADHD, there is a delay in the maturation of the cortical thickness of DLPFC between the ages of 7 and 10 years [13]. These differences in neuronal activity in the prefrontal region are associated with difficulties in attention control and inhibition in these children: inhibitory functions measured using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) show a lower inhibition capacity in individuals with ADHD than without ADHD [14].
Considering the important consequences generated by the symptoms of this disorder, it is essential to better understand the role of the placebo/nocebo effect and expectations in children with ADHD in a medical (pain) and academic (attentional skills) context. Our goal is to better understand how this placebo/nocebo effects and expectations are associated with changes in the DLPFC and the inhibitory functions. This study also aims to better characterize the role of neurophysiological and neuroanatomical factors in these contexts, with the distant goal of contributing to the development of stronger tools for differential diagnostics.
Objectives (1) To compare the placebo/nocebo effect on pain and (2) on attention abilities in children with and without ADHD. (3) To determine if there is a relationship between the placebo/nocebo effect and neurophysiological (inhibitory mechanisms) and neuroanatomical (DLPFC) measures.
Assumptions
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Crossover
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Single (Participant)
盲法说明
The participants think they are taking two medications (if not in the "control group"), but the care provider and investigators know that only placebos (a placebo and a nocebo) are given.
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 8 Years 至 9 Years(Child)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Child 8 or 9 years old
- •ADHD diagnosis confirmed by a qualified health professional (for the ADHD group only).
- •Understand French
排除标准
- •Other neurological problems other than ADHD
- •Diagnosis of a psychological disorder
- •Intellectual disability
结局指标
主要结局
Placebo and nocebo effect on pain
时间窗: Change from pre-test pain sensation to the pain sensation after the two "medications" (collected in one visit in March-April during the pre-test, after the placebo and after the nocebo. Data will be reported within the following 6 months.
Pain (thermal) will be generated using an experimental pain paradigm using a thermode (heat). Perceived pain level will be assessed using a standardized tool; a computer-connected Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The participant can score the pain sensation with a 0 to 10 scale, where 0 means "no pain" and 10 "the most intense pain tolerable".
Placebo and nocebo effect on attention abilities
时间窗: Change from pre-test results to the results observed after the two "medications" (collected in one visit in March-April during the pre-test, after the placebo and after the nocebo. Data will be reported within the following 6 months.
Attention abilities will be assessed using equivalent randomly assigned attentional tasks, the Stop signal task (SST). The measured outcomes are the reaction times in milisecond (ms) and the proportion of correct/incorrect reactions.
次要结局
- Neuroanatomical measures : DLPFC neural connection(The outcome measure should be assessed during the visit 2, which should occur in 3-4 months. Data should be reported within the following 6 months.)
- Neurophysiological measures: inhibitory mechanisms(The outcome measure should be assessed during the visit 2, which should occur in 3-4 months. Data should be reported within the following 6 months.)
- Heart rate measures(Change from pre-test results and to the results observed after the two "medications" (collected continuously in visit 1 in March-April during the pre-tests, after the placebo and after the nocebo. Data will be reported within the following 6 months.)
- Anxiety traits(Assessment during visit 1 in March-April. Data will be reported within the following 6 months.)
- Sleep quality - Child(Assessment during visit 1 in March-April. Data will be reported within the following 6 months.)
- Neuroanatomical measures : DLPFC gray matter volume(The outcome measure should be assessed during the visit 2, which should occur in 3-4 months. Data should be reported within the following 6 months.)
- Neuroanatomical measures : DLPFC neural activity(The outcome measure should be assessed during the visit 2, which should occur in 3-4 months. Data should be reported within the following 6 months.)
- Neuroanatomical measures : DLPFC vascularisation(The outcome measure should be assessed during the visit 2, which should occur in 3-4 months. Data should be reported within the following 6 months.)
- ADHD symptoms(Assessment during visit 1 in March-April. Data will be reported within the following 6 months.)
- Pain catastrophizing(Assessment during visit 1 in March-April. Data will be reported within the following 6 months.)
- Sociodemographic measures(Assessment during visit 1 in March-April. Data will be reported within the following 6 months.)
- Sleep quality - Parent(Assessment during visit 1 in March-April. Data will be reported within the following 6 months.)
研究者
Guillaume Léonard
Principal Investigator
Université de Sherbrooke
