MedPath

Low-Cost, Portable Flexible Nasopharyngoscope in Head & Neck Cancers in Low Resource Settings - Optimization Phase

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Head and Neck Cancer
Oral Cancer
Interventions
Device: Nasopharyngoscope
Registration Number
NCT04905134
Lead Sponsor
Duke University
Brief Summary

This study aims to develop and evaluate a low-cost, portable, flexible nasopharyngeal scope (FNS) used to assess head and neck cancers (HNC) in low resource settings. The FNS will be compared to an endoscope that is used as standard of care (SOC) in terms of ease of use, image quality, and perceived pain. The ultimate goal is to compare the ease of use between the FNS to what is used in SOC.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
50
Inclusion Criteria
  • Willing and able to provide signed and dated informed consent form
  • Willing to comply with all study procedures and be available for the duration of the study
  • Male or female, aged 18 or older
  • Patients who clinical meet clinical criteria for SOC scope examination of the upper aerodigestive tract. This includes signs and symptoms such as dysphagia, nasal obstruction, neck mass, throat pain, and hoarseness.
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Withdrawal of consent during the study duration
  • Subjects who have complications from the SOC exam
  • Anyone unable to under the SOC exam
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Patients evaluated using flexible nasopharyngoscope prototype deviceNasopharyngoscope-
Providers using flexible nasopharyngoscope prototype deviceNasopharyngoscope-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number of Participant Exams in Which Providers Reported the FNS (Flexible Nasopharyngoscope) is Easy to Useup to 15 minutes

Measured using a 5 point scale, with 1=Very hard, 2=Harder, 3=Same, 4=Easier and 5=Very Easy.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number of Patients Who Experienced an Adverse Event Following the Use of the Flexible ScopeDay 1
Number of Patients Who Experienced More, the Same, or Less Pain/Discomfort With the Flexible Scope Compared With the Standard of Care (SOC) ScopeDay 1

Comparison made using a 3 point scale where 1=much more, 2=about the same, and 3=much less.

Image Quality of the Standard of Care (SOC) Scope as Measured on a 5-point ScaleDay 1

Measured using a 5 point scale where 1=poor, 2=fair, 3=good, 4=very good, and 5=excellent. Reported here is the number of participant exams in which providers scored the image quality of the SOC scope at each value.

Image Quality of the Flexible Scope as Measured on a 5-point ScaleDay 1

Measured using a 5 point scale where 1=poor, 2=fair, 3=good, 4=very good, and 5=excellent. Reported here is the number of participant exams in which providers scored the image quality of the flexible scope at each value.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Duke University Medical Center

🇺🇸

Durham, North Carolina, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath