Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02346864
NCT02346864CompletedNot Applicable

Effect of Three-Stair-Position on Improvement of Apnea of Prematurity and Feeding Performance in Prematurity: A Randomized Control Trial

Children's Hospital of Fudan University0 sites144 target enrollmentStarted: December 1, 2013Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
144
Primary Endpoint
Frequency of desaturation which defined as oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry (SPO2)<85%

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is evaluating the effectiveness of three-stair-position (TSP) on the rate of Apnea of Prematurity (AOP), the feeding performance and the vital signs.

Detailed Description

Apnea of Prematurity (AOP) is common critical symptoms of preterm infants with great harm for prematurity. Recurrent apnea may lead to brain damage caused by hypoxia, affecting the nervous system, even threatening life (1, 2). Therefore, choosing an intervention which can prevent and reduce occurrence of AOP with fewer side effects is an important issue that should be closely watched by neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) health care.

Prone position is the forefront treatment due to its simple, economic and non-invasive. In clinic, it includes horizontal prone position (HPP), Head elevated tilt 15 ° prone position (HETP) and three-step-prone position (TSP)(3).Many studies have shown that HETP can allow thoracic volume increased and make abdominal movement more coordinated in preterm children, and then it is more favorable than the HPP on improving respiratory function. So HETP has been a routine position in NICU instead of HPP (4, 5). HETP, however, always make the babies slide to the foot of the bed resulting in airway obstruction. Therefore, scholars have proposed TSP which should prevent this phenomenon (6). In the study, the effectiveness of TSP on improvement of AOP will be evaluated trying to find a more suitable position for preterm infants.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Prevention
Masking
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
— to 3 Days (Child)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •preterm, gestational age(GA) <34weeks determined by obstetric ultra-sonogram and clinical examination
  • •steady vital signs
  • •Apgar scores were greater than or equal to 3 at 1min and greater than or equal to 5 at 5 minutes.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •infants with congenital malformation,for example Congenital Heart Disease, Diaphragmatic hernia, Hirschsprung,etc
  • •Infants who need special position and/or intervention (gastroschisis or umbilical catheterization)
  • •weight<1000g
  • •infants who were undertaking conventional invasive mechanical ventilation.

Arms & Interventions

Three-stair-position group

Experimental

The infants in the study group (n=72) received three-stair-position (TSP) intervention (head up 15°) for a week.

Intervention: Three-stair-position (Behavioral)

head elevated tilt position group

Other

The control group(n=72)received head elevated tilt position (HETP) intervention (head up 15°) for a week.

Intervention: Head elevated tilt position group (Behavioral)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Frequency of desaturation which defined as oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry (SPO2)<85%

Time Frame: 7 Days

The rate of AOP

Time Frame: 7 Days

Secondary Outcomes

  • Adverse events during feeding(7 Days)
  • respiratory rate(7 Days)
  • Number of Participants with distension(7 Days)
  • amount of retention milk(7 Days)
  • SPO2(7 Days)
  • Times of milk retention(7 Days)
  • Heart rate(7 Days)
  • Number of Participants with Adverse Events(7 Days)
  • Number of Participants who need treatments(7 Days)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Similar Trials