跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02729675
NCT02729675已完成2 期

Innovative Approaches to Increase F&V Intake Thru Worksites: The Fresh Initiative

Brown University0 个研究点目标入组 1,804 人开始时间: 2010年9月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
2 期
状态
已完成
入组人数
1,804
主要终点
Change in Fruit and Vegetable Intake

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this project is to study the efficacy of a delivery system to offer fresh fruits and vegetables (F&V) at discount prices for purchase at worksites in conjunction with educational interventions on increasing employees' F&V consumption in comparison to an intervention receiving fruit and vegetable markets alone or a comparison intervention.

详细描述

"Good to Go" (GTG) is a cluster randomized trial, which is studying the efficacy of innovative multi-level worksite interventions including educational/behavioral interventions and/or a fruit and vegetable (F&V) market at the worksite to improve F&V intake of employees. The hypothesis is that providing convenient, inexpensive access to F&V at the workplace through a F&V market will increase the availability of F&V at the workplace as well as at home and increase F&V intake of the employee. However, because it is unclear if improving F&V access and availability alone is adequate to increase F&V intake, the investigators will test the efficacy of the F&V delivery intervention alone and in combination with a promotional/educational intervention delivered at the worksite. The efficacy of these innovative interventions will be tested during a cluster randomized trial with 21 worksites to determine which interventions are most efficacious in increasing F&V consumption.

The primary specific aims of this proposed research are to employ a cluster randomized trial to study the efficacy of delivering fresh F&V at reduced prices for purchase at worksites (access intervention); the F&V delivery intervention paired with educational interventions to change informational and social environments at the worksite (enhanced intervention); and a comparison intervention acting as an attention placebo. The study will compare the efficacy of the Access intervention and the enhanced intervention with the comparison Arm and will also compare the efficacy of the Access intervention to the Enhanced intervention.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Prevention
盲法
Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • works at least 25 hours per week at the worksite
  • is on-site at least half of every day shift during the week
  • reads and understands English.

排除标准

  • has a medical condition that would prevent consumption of most fruits and vegetables,

结局指标

主要结局

Change in Fruit and Vegetable Intake

时间窗: Baseline, 6 and 12 months

Measured by National Cancer Institute Eating at America's Table All Day Screener

次要结局

  • Change in fruit and vegetable eating behaviors(Baseline, 6 and 12 months)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Kim Gans

Principal Investigator/Adjunct Professor

Brown University

相似试验