MedPath

Reduce Medication Errors by Translating AESOP Model Into CPOE Systems

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Hypertension
Interventions
Other: AESOP service system
Registration Number
NCT03484793
Lead Sponsor
Taipei Medical University
Brief Summary

Medication errors are common, life-threatening, costly but preventable. Information technology and automated systems are highly efficient for preventing medication errors and therefore widely employed in hospital settings. In this study, investigators would perform a cluster randomized controlled trial of a clinical reminding system that uses DNN and Probabilistic models to detect and notify physicians of inappropriate prescriptions, giving them the opportunity to correct these gaps and increase prescriptions completeness. This study aim is to assess whether or not this system would improve prescription notation for a broad array of patient conditions.

Detailed Description

This paper focuses on "Big data" in the knowledge base, using "Data minig" study of DM (Disease-Medication) and MM (Medication-Medication) of relevance to develop associated decision resources system-"the intelligent safety system" (Advanced Electronic Safety of Prescriptions,AESOP Model), and test the system in the clinical environment in hospital can assist physicians when open orders reduce medication errors, the system is named "AESOP Model".

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
37
Inclusion Criteria
  • Physicians who are working at the outpatient clinics in hospitals.
  • Physicians who sign the consent form
Exclusion Criteria
  • Physicians who are unable to participate in this trial for the whole process
  • Physicians who do not sign the consent form

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
AESOP integrated to CPOE for reducing medication errorsAESOP service system18 were assigned to the experimental group
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
The acceptance rate of reminder between two groups intervention and control3 months

The primary outcome of this study is the acceptance rate of the reminder, defined as the number of reminders accepted divided by number of unique reminders presented. In certain instances, physicians might see the same reminder serially, so we aggregate presentations and acceptance of the same reminder for the same patients' prescriptions in our calculation of the acceptance rate.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
The changes in the number of reminder for each group3 months

As a secondary outcome, we measure the number of inappropriate prescriptions rate documented in the two groups during the two time periods and calculate the unadjusted relative rate of inappropriateness notation in the intervention group by comparing the number of inappropriateness recorded in the intervention arm during the intervention period to all other groups. The unadjusted relative rate is defined as the ratio (errorsintervention-post/errorscontrol-post)/ (errorsintervention-pre/errorscontrol-pre).

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

TMU-Shuang-Ho Hospital

🇨🇳

Taipei, Taiwan

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath