The Effect of Transmagnetic Stimulation on Descending Pain Modulation
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Completed
- Sponsor
- Rambam Health Care Campus
- Enrollment
- 94
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Amplitude of pain-evoked potentials
Study Overview
Brief Summary
While some indications of the neural circuits involved in the Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM) process are now available, there is still need to clarify what parts of the brain are essential for this process, whether the spino-brainstem loop is largely sufficient to explain CPM or whether other cerebral and spinal regions such as frontal, somatosensory and other cortical regions contribute substantially. Whereas mere observation of correlation between these circuits while activated by brain imaging is still of considerable interest, direct experimental manipulations by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) could even establish insights into causal relationships.
Detailed Description
rTMS of different intensities, frequencies and location will be applied during CPM to evaluate the central mechanisms of pain modulation, their location and role in pain reduction through enhancement or suppression of activity in the relevant brain regions. In other words, cortical regions that may be implicated in CPM will be determined by augmenting or interrupting their activity via rTMSapplied to the areas under investigation. The regions will be the pain network sites, which are assumed to control the top-down influence on CPM and are superficial enough to be stimulated by the magnetic coil. These include primarily DLPFC (dorsolateral prefrontal cortex) and OFC (orbitofrontal cortex), with possible later addition of other relevant sites such as ACC (anterior cortex cinguli), insula and somatosensory cortices, etc. Since rTMS may be administered in a manner that either reduces or enhances the excitability of the stimulated cortical region, it should be possible to clarify the inhibitory or excitatory role of these regions in the CPM process. In summary, the planned studies should allow for identifying the cortical regions of the descending pain system, which are critical as starting points for the top-down modulation of CPM.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Non Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel
- Primary Purpose
- Basic Science
- Masking
- Single (Participant)
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18 Years to 70 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Inclusion Criteria
- •age 18-70
- •males and females
- •right handed
Exclusion Criteria
- •metal in brain/skull
- •cardiac pacemaker
- •cohlear implants
- •history of head trauma
- •history of epilepsy or seizures
- •pregnancy
Arms & Interventions
healthy subjects
healthy subjects
Intervention: TMS system MagPro x100, Tonica Elektronik A/S, Denmark (Device)
pain patients
Migraine and muscle headache patients
Intervention: TMS system MagPro x100, Tonica Elektronik A/S, Denmark (Device)
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Amplitude of pain-evoked potentials
Time Frame: 1 week
Change in pain evoked potentials will be assessed before and after the TMS
Pain scores as measured by pain numerical scale (NPS)
Time Frame: 1 week
TMS directed to pain inhibitory cortical areas will evoke pain reduction
Secondary Outcomes
- conditioned pain modulation (CPM)(1 week)
Investigators
d_yarnitsky
head of Neurology Department
Rambam Health Care Campus
