Implementing and Sustaining a Transdiagnostic Sleep and Circadian Treatment to Improve Severe Mental Illness Outcomes in Community Mental Health Part 1: Implementation
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Sleep Disorder
- Sponsor
- University of California, Berkeley
- Enrollment
- 489
- Locations
- 10
- Primary Endpoint
- Patient-level Outcome: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - Sleep Disturbance
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 6 months ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The sleep disturbance commonly experienced by individuals with a severe mental illness (SMI) reduces these individuals' capacity to function and contributes to key symptoms. This study will test the effects of a sleep treatment that has been adapted using theory, data and stakeholder inputs to improve the fit for SMI patients treated in community mental health centers (CMHCs), relative to the standard treatment. The investigators will also determine if the adapted and standard versions can improve sleep, improve functioning and reduce symptoms.
Detailed Description
An obstacle to the roll-out of evidence-based psychological treatments (EBPTs) for severe mental illness (SMI) is that the context for the implementation typically differs from the original testing context causing a lack of "fit" between the setting and the EBPT. The investigators propose to evaluate if adapting a specific treatment to improve the contextual fit improves outcomes in a setting that typifies this challenge-community mental health centers (CMHCs). Following the Experimental Therapeutics Approach, the target is sleep and circadian dysfunction. In SMI, sleep and circadian dysfunction undermines affect regulation, cognitive function and physical health, predicts the onset and worsening of symptoms and is often chronic even with evidence-based SMI treatment. Prior treatment studies have been disorder-focused-they have treated a specific sleep problem (e.g., insomnia) in a specific diagnostic group (e.g., depression). However, real-life sleep and circadian problems are not so neatly categorized, particularly in SMI. Hence, the investigators developed the Transdiagnostic Intervention for Sleep and Circadian Dysfunction (TranS-C) to treat a wide range of sleep and circadian problems experienced in SMI. With NIMH support, including a study in CMHCs, the investigators established that TranS-C engages the target. Yet gaps remain: 1) Thus far, the TranS-C providers have been employed, trained and supervised by the university. The investigators will determine if TranS-C can be effectively delivered by providers within CMHCs. 2) The investigators will test a version of TranS-C that has been adapted to improve the fit and to address potential barriers to scaling TranS-C. The rigorous adaptation process used theory, data and stakeholder inputs. 3) The investigators will study ad hoc adaptations made by providers to TranS-C. 4) The investigators include a Sustainment Phase (1 year), responding to urgent calls to study the sustainability of EBPTs. This entry describes the Implementation Phase, the first of a three-phase hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation trial. In this phase, implementation and effectiveness outcomes of two versions of TranS-C (Standard and Adapted) are compared with CMHC providers who are trained by treatment experts. Guided by the Replicating Effective Programs (REP) framework, at least 8 CMHC clinic sites will be cluster randomized to either Standard or Adapted TranS-C. Then, within each CMHC site, patients will be randomized to immediate TranS-C or to Usual Care followed by Delayed Treatment (UC-DT). A total of 96 providers and 576 patients. Patients will be assessed pre, mid and post-treatment and at 6 months follow-up. UC Berkeley will co-ordinate the research, facilitate implementation, collect data etc. Providers within an established network of CMHCs will implement TranS-C. SA1 is to confirm that both Standard vs. Adapted TranS-C, compared to UC-DT, improve sleep and circadian functioning and reduce functional impairment and disorder-focused psychiatric symptoms. SA2 is to evaluate the fit, to the CMHC context, of Standard vs. Adapted TranS-C via provider ratings of acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility. SA3 will examine if better fit, operationalized via provider ratings of acceptability, mediates the relationship between treatment condition and patient outcome. This research will determine if sleep and circadian problems can be effectively addressed in SMI in CMHC settings, test two variations of TranS-C that each have unique advantages and focus on community providers and typical community patients.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •The inclusion criteria for CMHCs are:
- •Publicly funded adult mental health outpatient services
- •Support from CMHC leadership
- •The inclusion criteria for CMHC providers are:
- •Employed or able to deliver client-facing services to CMHC clients
- •Interest in learning and delivering TranS-C
- •Volunteer to participate and formally consent to participate
- •Consumers must meet the following inclusion criteria:
- •Aged 18 years and older
- •Meet criteria for an SMI per self-report and confirmed by referring provider or administration of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) (DSM-5, Version 7.0.0) by a licensed clinical social worker on the research team
Exclusion Criteria
- •Presence of an active and progressive physical illness or neurological degenerative disease directly related to the onset and course of the sleep and circadian dysfunction, or making participation in the study unfeasible based on confirmation from the treating clinician and/or medical record
- •Presence of substance abuse/dependence only if it makes participation in the study unfeasible
- •Current active intent or plan to commit suicide (those with suicidal ideation are eligible) only if it makes participation in the study unfeasible, or homicide risk
- •Night shift work \>2 nights per week in the past 3 months
- •Pregnancy or breast-feeding
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Patient-level Outcome: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - Sleep Disturbance
Time Frame: Baseline, mid-treatment (2 weeks post-baseline for Adapted TranS-C and 4 weeks post-baseline for Standard TranS-C), post-treatment (4 weeks post-baseline for Adapted TranS-C and 8 weeks post-baseline for Standard TranS-C), and 6-month follow-up.
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Sleep Disturbance Scale. The 8-item short version scale assesses perceived sleep problems (e.g., sleep quality, perception of sleep difficulties) over a 7-day period. Items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much). Raw scores are summed to produce a single score, resulting in a range from 8 to 40. Raw scores are converted to t-scores using treatment manuals. T-scores range from 30.5 to 77.5. A T-score of 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicate worse sleep disturbance.
Provider-level Outcome: Acceptability Intervention Measure
Time Frame: Baseline, mid-treatment (2 weeks post-baseline for Adapted TranS-C and 4 weeks post-baseline for Standard TranS-C), post-treatment (4 weeks post-baseline for Adapted TranS-C and 8 weeks post-baseline for Standard TranS-C).
Assesses provider perceptions of the acceptability of the treatment intervention using a self-report questionnaire. The 4-item scale is rated on a 5-point scale from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). A total score is calculated by averaging all four items. Total scores range from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater perceptions of acceptability.
Secondary Outcomes
- Patient-level Outcome: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - Sleep Related Impairment(Baseline, mid-treatment (2 weeks post-baseline for Adapted TranS-C and 4 weeks post-baseline for Standard TranS-C), post-treatment (4 weeks post-baseline for Adapted TranS-C and 8 weeks post-baseline for Standard TranS-C), and 6-month follow-up.)
- Patient-level Outcome: Composite Sleep Health Score(Baseline, mid-treatment (2 weeks post-baseline for Adapted TranS-C and 4 weeks post-baseline for Standard TranS-C), post-treatment (4 weeks post-baseline for Adapted TranS-C and 8 weeks post-baseline for Standard TranS-C), and 6-month follow-up.)
- Patient-level Outcome: Sheehan Disability Scale(Baseline, post-treatment (4 weeks post-baseline for Adapted TranS-C and 8 weeks post-baseline for Standard TranS-C), and 6-month follow-up.)
- Patient-level Outcome: The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure(Baseline, post-treatment (4 weeks post-baseline for Adapted TranS-C and 8 weeks post-baseline for Standard TranS-C), and 6-month follow-up.)
- Provider-level Outcome: Intervention Appropriateness Measure(Baseline, mid-treatment (2 weeks post-baseline for Adapted TranS-C and 4 weeks post-baseline for Standard TranS-C), post-treatment (4 weeks post-baseline for Adapted TranS-C and 8 weeks post-baseline for Standard TranS-C).)
- Provider-level Outcome: Feasibility of Intervention Measure(Baseline, mid-treatment (2 weeks post-baseline for Adapted TranS-C and 4 weeks post-baseline for Standard TranS-C), post-treatment (4 weeks post-baseline for Adapted TranS-C and 8 weeks post-baseline for Standard TranS-C).)