Analysis of Bone changes in patients rceving three differing implant designs
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: K068- Other specified disorders of gingiva and edentulous alveolar ridge
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2024/05/067565
- Lead Sponsor
- self funding
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Male or female patients with age group between 25 to 60 years
Patients not contraindicated for periodontal or implant surgery
One bounded edentulous space ie a single tooth missing with intact proximal teeth primarily in the lower posteriors premolars and molars with sufficient bone quantity to allow implant placement
Patients should be cooperative motivated and oral hygiene conscious
Sufficient bone height at least 13mm and sufficient bone width at least 6mm should be present
Presence of local factors without signs of clinical inflammation
Stable occlusion with no para functional habits
Presence of active periodontal disease at the time of implant surgery
Patients who did not accept to comply for 1 year follow-up were excluded from the study
Patient diagnosed with known systemic diseases Bone disorders like hyperparathyroidism osteoporosis or Pagets disease
Patients who are under steroids antiinflammatory and bisphosphonates in the past 6 months
Patients who are treated with radiotherapy or chemotherapeutic agents.
Chronic alcoholics or drug abuse
Smokers
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Mean Crestal bone level changes in mm to be assessed at Baseline and 1 year with standardized Intra oral periapical radiographs in Control SLA and Test groups SLA-Active and LMGI <br/ ><br>Implant survival rates in percentage to be assessed at 1 year with radiographic and clinical assessment between Control SLA and Test groups SLA Active and LMGI <br/ ><br>Timepoint: subjects will be followed at baseline, 6 months and 1 year <br/ ><br>
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To evaluate and compare the Relative position of gingival margin in mm at the implant site of Control SLA and Test groups SLA-Active and LMGI at Baseline 6 months and 1 year post loading <br/ ><br>To assess the Implant stability quotient ISQ values using resonance frequency analysis RFA during Immediate Loading protocol <br/ ><br>Timepoint: subjects will be followed at baseline, 6 months and 1 year