A Comparison of human crestal bone between using healing abutment and CAD/CAM abutment under surgical guided surgery (1- 2 year followed-up ), A Randomized Clinical Trial Study
- Registration Number
- TCTR20220515005
- Lead Sponsor
- Esthetic Restorative and Implant Dentistry Department
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- nknown
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 40
Patients with missing teeth in Posterior region with remaining adjacent teeth in between, needing single implant. This condition allows the surgical guides to be tooth-supported design._
No pathological mobility of adjacent teeth that supported surgical guide.
CBCT radiograph and clinical examination reveal sufficient bone volume to support the implants. (Buccal bone and lingual bone thickness at least 2mm.)
No limited mouth opening
Age 20 years and over that able to sign consent form.
Good general health at the time of selection (ASA class I or II).
Adequate oral hygiene
Dehiscence or lack of buccal bone plate
Irradiation in the head and neck area
Immunosuppressed or immunocompromised patients
Treated or under treatment with intravenous amino-bisphosphonates
Uncontrolled diabetes
Addiction to alcohol or drugs
Adjacent tooth between dental implant has pocket depth>5mm.
Heavy smoking (>10 cigarettes daily)
Parafunction
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Observational
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Vertical bone loss 1-2 year Periapical radiograph was taken by using the paralleling technique (60 kV, 10 mA, 0.250s) with an individual rigid index made from acrylic resin
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Horizontal bone loss 1-2 year Periapical radiograph was taken by using the paralleling technique (60 kV, 10 mA, 0.250s) with an individual rigid index made from acrylic resin