Vestibular rehabilitation of spatial disorders and neglect
Not Applicable
Recruiting
- Conditions
- I69.3R27R29.5Sequelae of cerebral infarctionOther lack of coordination
- Registration Number
- DRKS00003233
- Lead Sponsor
- Klinikum der Universität München, Campus Großhadern
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 45
Inclusion Criteria
• patients after unilateral cerebral vascular stroke
• age of 18 years and older
• No severe peripheral visual deficit
• Behavioral Inattention Score 135 and above
Exclusion Criteria
• Metal implant(s) in the body
• Brain tumor(s)
• Scalp Inflammation
• Epilepsy
• Degenerative diseases or psychiatric disorder(s)
• Eye Infections
Study & Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method German version of the Behavioral Inattention Test (BIT)and visuo-tactile search performed 6 weeks after start of intervention.<br><br>The primary outcome measures are the German adaptation (Fels & Geisser, 1996) of the Behavioral Inattention Test (BIT) (Wilson et al., 1987) and a visuo-spatial search task (adapted from Schindler et al., 2006). The BIT is a standardized and commonly used measure of hemispatial neglect (Hartman-Maeir & Katz, 1995). It comprises a broad variety of tasks ranging from visual search and line bisection to reading and handling clocks. The visuo-spatial search task is a very practical, cross-modal task assessing patients’ ability to locate objects in space.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Subjective visual vertical and subjective haptic vertical evaluated 6 weeks after start of intervention.<br><br>As secondary outcome measures, the subjective visual vertical (SVV) and subjective haptic (SHV) vertical are assessed. Numerous studies investigating the subjective vertical in hemispatial neglect patients have demonstrated deviations in both modalities (Funk et al., 2010a,b; Utz et al., 2011c). To evaluate the visual modality the bucket method will be used. Zwergal et al. (2009) suggested this method as an easily performed and reliable bedside test. For the haptic modality we will use an adapted apparatus as described in Utz et al. (2011c).