Immunological Response After Ablative Therapy in the Liver
- Conditions
- Immune ResponseHepatocellular Carcinoma
- Interventions
- Device: Microwave ablationDevice: Irreversible electroporation
- Registration Number
- NCT03040453
- Lead Sponsor
- Karolinska Institutet
- Brief Summary
Local ablative treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma is performed primary on patients not eligible for liver transplant or liver resection. At our Hospital two different methods are used: Microwave ablation, where the tumor cells are heated up and killed, and Irreversible electroporation, where the tumor cells are exposed to an electrical field and nano-pores are formed in the cell membranes and the cells go into apoptosis (programed cell death).
Previous studies have shown effects on the immune system after ablative therapies.
The purpose of this study is to compare the immunological response after the wo different methods of killing the tumor cells.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- WITHDRAWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- Not specified
- Hepatocellular carcinoma, maximum 3 lesions, maximum 30 mm in any cross section diameter
- Physically fit to undergo general anaesthesia
- Fully understand swedish instructions regarding the study
- Atrial fibrillation (for irreversible electroporation)
- Pacemaker (for irreversible electroporation)
- >3 lesions
- > 30 mm in any cross section diameter
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Microwave ablation Microwave ablation 20 patients will be treated with microwave ablation Irreversible electroporation Irreversible electroporation 20 patients will be treated with irreversible electroporation
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Immunological response Change from baseline (morning of the procedure) measured at post operative day 1,7, 28 and 90 Change in immunological response
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Number of participants with complete radiological response at follow up 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. Follow-up every three months for one year with CT scan. Compare the effect of the two different ablative methods
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Department of Surgery and Urology, Danderyd Hospital
🇸🇪Stockholm, Sweden