Skip to main content
MedPathMedPath Home
Clinical Trials/NCT04253795
NCT04253795
Suspended
Not Applicable

Comparative Study of Nonintubated Anesthesia With Laryngeal Mask Versus Intubated Anesthesia With Double Lumen Tube in Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery

Antalya Training and Research Hospital1 site in 1 country60 target enrollmentSeptember 2020
Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInShare to Reddit
ConditionsIntubation

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Intubation
Sponsor
Antalya Training and Research Hospital
Enrollment
60
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
difference in PaO2/FiO2 ratio at the end of the surgery
Status
Suspended
Last Updated
6 years ago
OverviewInvestigatorsEligibility CriteriaOutcomesSitesSimilar Trials

Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare to the patients undergoing nonintubated general anesthesia with laryngeal mask and undergoing intubated general anesthesia with double-lumen endotracheal intubation in Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS).

Detailed Description

Although general anesthesia with double-lumen intubation is generally mandatory for Video-assisted thoracic surgery procedures intubation with double lumen tube is related to several risks. Nonintubated general anesthesia with laryngeal mask in patients with spontaneous breathing may be an alternative choice for minor VATS procedures.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
September 2020
End Date
February 2021
Last Updated
6 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Antalya Training and Research Hospital
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Patients undergoing elective minor VATS procedures will be enrolled the study

Exclusion Criteria

  • •patients \<18 years old,
  • •body mass index (BMI)\>30 kg/m2,
  • •American Society Association (ASA) Class\>3,
  • •heart failure (New York Heart Association class \> II),
  • •a history of arrhythmia or treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs,
  • •bradycardia (heart rate (HR) \<45 beats min1)
  • •atrioventricular block,
  • •hepatic or renal dysfunction,
  • •coagulopathy,
  • •sleep apnea syndrome

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

difference in PaO2/FiO2 ratio at the end of the surgery

Time Frame: 1 hour

PaO2/FiO2 ratio will be calculated for both groups at the end of the surgery

Secondary Outcomes

  • Post anesthetic care unit (PACU) time(30 minutes)
  • Surgeon satisfaction(10 minutes)
  • Anesthesia time(20 minutes)
  • Operating room time(1 hour)
  • Patient satisfaction(10 minutes)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparison of the effect of general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia on a reflex which changes blood pressureHealth Condition 1: null- Patients coming for elective procedure requiring invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring
CTRI/2017/03/008105Sree Kumar E J60
Recruiting
Not Applicable
The effect of type of anesthesia method on serum cytokines in cesarean sectio
IRCT20200930048887N1Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences30
Completed
Not Applicable
COMPARISON OF TWO ANAESTHETIC TECHNIQUES CHILDREN UNDERGOING EAR SURGERYHealth Condition 1: null- CHILDREN WITH HEARING DISABILITY UNDERGOING COCHLEAR IMPLANT SURGERY UNDER GENERAL ANAESTHESIAHealth Condition 2: H838- Other specified diseases of innerear
CTRI/2018/03/012610ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES NEW DELHI50
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of the Effect of General Anesthesia with Opioids vs Opioid Free Anesthesia on Postoperative Pain in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
IRCT20171004036548N1Kashan University of Medical Sciences160
Completed
Phase 2
Comparison the effects of general anesthesia with isoflurane-nitrous oxide versus propofol-alfentanil on desirable condition of extubation of patients with arch bar in mandibular fracture surgeryMandibular fracture.Fracture of mandible
IRCT201405037695N4Vice-Chancellor for Research Qazvin University of Medical Sciences60