Effect of Milnacipran on Pain Processing and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) Activation Patterns in Patients With Fibromyalgia
- Registration Number
- NCT00793520
- Lead Sponsor
- Forest Laboratories
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of milnacipran on how the brain processes pain in patients with fibromyalgia and to assess the relationship between this effect and brain activation patterns during functional magnetic resonance imaging.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- TERMINATED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 2
- Diagnosis of fibromyalgia defined by 1990 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria
- Visual analog pain score between 40 and 90 mm
- Right-hand dominance
- Suicidal risk
- Substance Abuse
- Pulmonary dysfunction
- Renal impairment
- Active cardiac disease
- Autoimmune disease
- Uncontrolled narrow-angle glaucoma
- Active liver disease
- Cancer
- Active peptic ulcer disease or a history of inflammatory bowel disease or celiac sprue
- Unstable endocrine disease
- Prostatic enlargement
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description 1 Placebo Twice daily oral administration of milnacipran for 5 weeks, placebo for 2 weeks, and crossover to placebo for 5 weeks. 2 Placebo Twice daily oral administration of placebo for 5 weeks, placebo for 2 weeks, and crossover to milnacipran for 5 weeks. 1 Milnacipran Twice daily oral administration of milnacipran for 5 weeks, placebo for 2 weeks, and crossover to placebo for 5 weeks. 2 Milnacipran Twice daily oral administration of placebo for 5 weeks, placebo for 2 weeks, and crossover to milnacipran for 5 weeks.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in Medium Pressure Pain Threshold From Baseline to End of Treatment. Week 0, 5, 7 and 12 Pain intensity is rated using the Gracely Box Scale, where 0 is no pain sensation and 20 is extremely intense. Painful blunt pressure is applied to the thumbnail of the patient's left hand. A software system will determine medium(rated as 7 or 8) and high pain (rated as 13 or 14) thresholds at baseline, week 5 and at a second baseline at week 7 and week 12.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in Diffuse Noxious Inhibitory Control (DNIC) Effect From Baseline to End of Treatment. Weeks 0, 5, 7 and 12 DNIC is evaluated using a conditioning stimulus and a test stimulus. Painful blunt pressure is applied to the thumbnail of the patient's left hand for 30 sec. Patient rates pain experienced on numerical scale of 0(no pain) to 100(worst pain) at 10, 20 \& 30 sec. This is repeated 3 times and a mean pain score is calculated. 5 minutes following test stimulus, patient's right hand is immersed in 12C water at 30 sec test stimulus is reapplied and a 2nd mean pain score is calculated. The difference in mean pain rating before and after conditioning stimulus indicates presence and magnitude of DNIC
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Forest Investigative Site
🇺🇸Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States