Implant Placement Using a Newly Designed Single Drill Versus Conventional Sequential Drills

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Implant Complication
• Interventions: Other: drill

• Registration Number: NCT04877145
• Lead Sponsor: Assiut University

Brief Summary

dental implants are usually placed by sequential set of drills which could increase the time of the surgery and could raise the temperature of the osteotomy preparation so a new drill was designed to place the implants fast and easy way

Detailed Description

Dental implant success is evident nowadays with the predictable functional and aesthetic results obtained . Simplified techniques and approaches are preferred for the convenience of both the patients and operators . Current research is focusing on decreasing the number of instruments used, shortening of the operation time and performing flapless approaches for implant placement whenever possible. This is done to reduce the postoperative complaints, such as pain, swelling and bleeding; thus decreasing the need for analgesics and minimising the occurrence of morbidity .

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2017-02-12
• Primary Completion: 2021-02-08
• Study Completion: 2021-04-20
• Status Verified: 2021-05
• Study First Submitted: 2021-05-01
• Study First Submitted QC: 2021-05-05
• Last Update Submitted: 2021-05-05
• Study First Posted: 2021-05-07
• Last Update Posted: 2021-05-07

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 61

Inclusion Criteria

• The inclusion criteria :

  • implant recipient sites free from any pathological conditions.
  • Patients who were cooperative, motivated and hygiene conscious were selected.
  • non smoker patients

• exclusion criteria :

  • Patients unable to undergo minor oral surgical procedures
  • patients with a history of drug abuse or catabolic drugs were not included.
  • Patients with a history of psychiatric disorder and those with unrealistic expectations about the aesthetic outcome of implant therapy were also excluded.
  • Patients with insufficient vertical inter-arch space, on centric occlusion, to accommodate the available restorative components .
  • Uncontrolled diabetic patients
  • Patient who had any systemic condition that may contraindicate implant therapy (impaired wound healing - bleeding disorders
  • patients who had any habits that might jeopardise the osseointegration process, such as heavy smoking and alcoholism.
  • Patients with para-functional habits that produce overload on the implant, such as bruxism and clenching were excluded.

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
sequential drills	drill	For the control group, four drills (2.2mm, 2.75mm, 3.25mm and 4mm diameter),
single drill	drill	one drill to place the implants 3.25mm diameter stainless steel drill was used.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
osseointegration of the dental implants	6 months	healing and union of the dental implants with the surrounding bone measured by torque wrench exceeds 30 N/CM

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
bone loss	6 months , 1 ,2 and 3 years after function	by periapical xray the bone loss measured from the platform of the implant if present unit of measurement : mm
mobility	6 months	the fixation of the implants checked by perio test M (-8- 0) INDICATES nonmobile

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Assiut University; 🇪🇬 Assuit, Egypt