Comparison of two types of Laryngoscopes undergoing surgery under General Anaesthesia
Not Applicable
Not yet recruiting
- Conditions
- New Technology,
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2020/07/026731
- Lead Sponsor
- Safdarjung hospital and Vardhman Mahavir Medical College New Delhi India
- Brief Summary
Objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of CMAC Miller videolaryngoscope with that of Miller direct laryngoscope in terms of total time taken for successful endotracheal intubation in infants undergoing elective surgical procedures under General Anaeshesia.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Not Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 80
Inclusion Criteria
All children from 1 month to 1 year of age, weighing 3 to 10 kgs, of either sex, belonging to American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) grade I and II, undergoing elective surgical procedures under general anaesthesia .
Exclusion Criteria
- Anticipated difficult airway, upper respiratory tract infection, raised intracranial pressure 2.
- Congenital anomalies of head, face and neck, cardiovascular and respiratory system.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Total time taken for successful endotracheal intubation At baseline
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1. Time for achieving best glottic view and Tube insertion time 2. POGO (Percentage of glottic opening) score
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Safdarjung hospital and Vardhman Mahavir Medical College
🇮🇳Delhi, DELHI, India
Safdarjung hospital and Vardhman Mahavir Medical College🇮🇳Delhi, DELHI, IndiaSamritiPrincipal investigator9268586607samdoc31@gmail.com