Skip to main content
MedPathMedPath Home
Clinical Trials/NCT02827123
NCT02827123
Completed
Not Applicable

A Comparison of McGrath MAC Videolaryngoscopy and Macintosh Laryngoscopy for Orotracheal Intubation in Children

Ajou University School of Medicine1 site in 1 country84 target enrollmentJuly 2016
Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInShare to Reddit
ConditionsAnesthesia, Endotracheal
InterventionsMcGrath MAC videolaryngoscopyMacintosh Laryngoscopy
DrugsMacintosh Laryngoscopy

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
McGrath MAC videolaryngoscopy
Conditions
Anesthesia, Endotracheal
Sponsor
Ajou University School of Medicine
Enrollment
84
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Intubation time
Status
Completed
Last Updated
7 years ago
OverviewInvestigatorsEligibility CriteriaArms & InterventionsOutcomesSitesSimilar Trials

Overview

Brief Summary

The primary purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of McGrath MAC videolaryngoscopy on the intubation time for orotracheal intubation in children.

The secondary purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of McGrath MAC videolaryngoscopy on Cormack and Lehane Grade for orotracheal intubation in children.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
July 2016
End Date
September 2016
Last Updated
7 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Ajou University School of Medicine
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Ji Eun Kim

Assitant professor

Ajou University School of Medicine

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • •orotracheal intubation under general anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria

  • •oral lesions, congenital anomaly, cervical spine instability, rapid sequence intubation

Arms & Interventions

Mcgrath group

Orotracheal intubation with McGrath MAC videolaryngoscopy

Intervention: McGrath MAC videolaryngoscopy

Macintosh group

Orotracheal intubation with Macintosh laryngoscopy

Intervention: Macintosh Laryngoscopy

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Intubation time

Time Frame: through intubation completion, an average of 30 second

Time interval between laryngoscopy passing the teeth to the confirming of end tidal CO2

Secondary Outcomes

  • The degree of glottic exposure as assessed by Cormack and Lehane Grade(Up to 5 second after laryngoscopy passing the teeth)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Completed
Not Applicable
A Comparison of McGrath MAC Videolaryngoscopy and Macintosh Laryngoscopy for Orotracheal Intubation in Children With TorticollisAnesthesia, Endotracheal
NCT03582787Ajou University School of Medicine30
Completed
Phase 4
Effects of Videolaryngoscope on Intraocular PressureIntubation Complication
NCT02474394Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University80
Completed
Not Applicable
McGrath Videolaryngoscopy and Direct Laryngoscopy Rapid Sequence IntubationSurgery
NCT05850052The Cleveland Clinic400
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Videolaryngoscopy vs Direct Laryngoscopy for Double Lumen Tube Lumen Tube Placement - A Multicentre Randomized-controlled Trial (VOLCANO Study)One Lung VentilationIntubation Complication
NCT06466759Luca Brazzi750
Completed
Not Applicable
Effects of C-MAC Videolaryngoscope, McGRATH Videolaryngoscope and Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope on Intraocular Pressure and HemodynamicsAnesthesiology Devices Associated With Adverse IncidentsIntraocular Pressure
NCT03589638Inonu University3