Effects of Muscle Energy Technique Versus Aerobic Exercises on Pain and Disability in Patients With Chronic Pelvic Pain
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 40
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Pelvic pain impact questionnaire
研究概览
简要总结
The aim of study is to find out the effects of muscle energy technique versus aerobic exercises on pain and disability in patients with chronic pelvic pain.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 25 Years 至 45 Years（Adult）
- 性别
- Female
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •women with chronic pelvic pain of >6 months' duration and the cause of their pain is unknown
- •CPP was located within the true pelvis (between and below the anterior iliac crests)
- •Average score of at least 4 out of 10 (0-10) on a numeric rating scale
- •moderate to severe pain on pelvic pain impact questionnaire
排除标准
- •History of cancer
- •Pregnancy at the time of inclusion
- •Known pelvic pathology (eg, endometriosis, ovarian cyst, fibroid >3cm)
- •Intraabdominal and pelvic surgery within the last six months
- •chronic or recurrent gastro-intestinal disease including irritable bowel syndrome
- •Received any physiotherapy treatment within the previous month
结局指标
主要结局
Pelvic pain impact questionnaire
时间窗: 8th week
The Pelvic Pain Impact Questionnaire evaluates the pelvic pain impact on life. It has patient generated language, is easily managed and scored, has psychometric properties and it is appropriate for clinical settings and research across primary, secondary and tertiary care. The ten-item questionnaire consist of 8 Likert questions and 2 additional, non-scored questions
Numerical Pain Rating Scale
时间窗: 8th week
The Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) is a particular measure in which people rate their pain on an 11-point numerical scale. The scale is comprised of 0 (no pain at all) to 10, 0 show no pain at all and 10 indicate worst imaginable pain
次要结局
- Pain disability index(8th week)