Participant Satisfaction With Two Different Summative Assessment Methods - a Mixed Method Questionnaire Study
Completed
- Conditions
- Assessment Evaluation
- Interventions
- Other: different assessments
- Registration Number
- NCT03381443
- Lead Sponsor
- Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
- Brief Summary
Participants of Immediate Life Support and Advanced Life Support Courses, where two different summative assessment methods were used are asked about their satisfaction with the assessment method using a questionnaire. Both quantitative questions using an 11-point-Likert scale as well as open-ended qualitative questions will be asked. The primary aim of this study is to find out which variant of summative assessment is perceived by course participants as testing their leadership competency best, immediately after the comparison as well as 1 year later to identify any long-term effects on the students.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 428
Inclusion Criteria
- All 5th and 6th year medical students at the University of Bern, Switzerland, study year 2017/2018 and 2018/2019
Exclusion Criteria
- Refusal to participate
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description ERC different assessments all students assessed by the methods used by the European Resuscitation Council AHA different assessments all students assessed by the methods used by the American Heart Association
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Participant satisfaction with summative assessment methods during Life Support Courses directly after assessment and 1 year later evaluation of NTS assessed by assessment
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University of Bern
🇨ðŸ‡Bern, Switzerland