Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03853330
NCT03853330CompletedNot Applicable

Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia in Patients With Multiple Fracture Ribs

Assiut University1 site in 1 country108 target enrollmentStarted: December 1, 2019Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
108
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Pain score (verbal numeric rating scale) as the median VNRS at rest and cough

Study Overview

Brief Summary

To assess the analgesic and respiratory effect of continuous Erector Spinae Plane block versus Thoracic Epidural in patients with multiple fracture ribs.

Detailed Description

Erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a recently described technique which may be an alternative to Paravertebral block (PVB) for providing thoracic analgesia. It involves injection of local anesthetic into the fascial plane deep to erector spinae muscle. ESP is a more superficial block with a better defined end-point injection between the bony transverse process and erector spinae muscle. A more superficial ultrasound-guided block will be faster to perform and less painful for the patient. ESP does not have the same risk of pneumothorax as PVB.

Epidural analgesia has become the standard of care. Although thoracic epidurals provide excellent analgesia for the management of rib fractures, they are limited to a certain population due to patient factors and side-effects. Many trauma patients have other injuries which contraindicate the use of epidurals, or which prevent positioning for insertion. There are disadvantages to thoracic epidural analgesia. They are technically challenging to insert, with a risk of dural puncture or spinal cord injury. Adverse effects include hypotension, and if opioids used, urinary retention and pruritus. Patients can develop a motor block and are unable to mobilize with an epidural in situ.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Other
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking Description

prospective, double-blinded controlled trial; both the patient and data collector is unaware of the study nature

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 40 Years (Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients with multiple fracture ribs.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patient refusal.
  • Patients with pre-existing infection at the block site.
  • Coagulopathy.
  • Allergy to local anesthetics.
  • Pre-existing neurological deficits.
  • Psychiatric illness.

Arms & Interventions

Thoracic Epidural Analgesia group

Active Comparator

25 patients will receive ultrasound-guided thoracic epidural analgesia for multiple fracture ribs at the level of T8 with 7.5-12 ml of Bupivacaine HCl Inj 0.25% as a loading dose followed by catheter insertion and infusion of Bupivacaine Hydrochloride, 0.125%-0.9% Injectable Solution at 5-7 ml/h. For breakthrough pain bolus of Bupivacaine Hydrochloride, 0.125%-0.9% Injectable Solution 5-10 ml can be used.

Intervention: Ultrasound (Device)

Thoracic Epidural Analgesia group

Active Comparator

25 patients will receive ultrasound-guided thoracic epidural analgesia for multiple fracture ribs at the level of T8 with 7.5-12 ml of Bupivacaine HCl Inj 0.25% as a loading dose followed by catheter insertion and infusion of Bupivacaine Hydrochloride, 0.125%-0.9% Injectable Solution at 5-7 ml/h. For breakthrough pain bolus of Bupivacaine Hydrochloride, 0.125%-0.9% Injectable Solution 5-10 ml can be used.

Intervention: Bupivacaine HCl Inj 0.25% (Drug)

Thoracic Epidural Analgesia group

Active Comparator

25 patients will receive ultrasound-guided thoracic epidural analgesia for multiple fracture ribs at the level of T8 with 7.5-12 ml of Bupivacaine HCl Inj 0.25% as a loading dose followed by catheter insertion and infusion of Bupivacaine Hydrochloride, 0.125%-0.9% Injectable Solution at 5-7 ml/h. For breakthrough pain bolus of Bupivacaine Hydrochloride, 0.125%-0.9% Injectable Solution 5-10 ml can be used.

Intervention: Bupivacaine Hydrochloride, 0.125%-0.9% Injectable Solution (Drug)

Erector spinae plane block group

Active Comparator

25 patients will receive ultrasound-guided ESP block for multiple fracture ribs at the level from T1 to T5 with 7.5-12 ml of Bupivacaine HCl Inj 0.25% as a loading dose followed by catheter insertion and infusion of Bupivacaine Hydrochloride, 0.125%-0.9% Injectable Solution at 5-7 ml/h. For breakthrough pain bolus of Bupivacaine Hydrochloride, 0.125%-0.9% Injectable Solution 5-10 ml can be used.

Intervention: Ultrasound (Device)

Erector spinae plane block group

Active Comparator

25 patients will receive ultrasound-guided ESP block for multiple fracture ribs at the level from T1 to T5 with 7.5-12 ml of Bupivacaine HCl Inj 0.25% as a loading dose followed by catheter insertion and infusion of Bupivacaine Hydrochloride, 0.125%-0.9% Injectable Solution at 5-7 ml/h. For breakthrough pain bolus of Bupivacaine Hydrochloride, 0.125%-0.9% Injectable Solution 5-10 ml can be used.

Intervention: Bupivacaine HCl Inj 0.25% (Drug)

Erector spinae plane block group

Active Comparator

25 patients will receive ultrasound-guided ESP block for multiple fracture ribs at the level from T1 to T5 with 7.5-12 ml of Bupivacaine HCl Inj 0.25% as a loading dose followed by catheter insertion and infusion of Bupivacaine Hydrochloride, 0.125%-0.9% Injectable Solution at 5-7 ml/h. For breakthrough pain bolus of Bupivacaine Hydrochloride, 0.125%-0.9% Injectable Solution 5-10 ml can be used.

Intervention: Bupivacaine Hydrochloride, 0.125%-0.9% Injectable Solution (Drug)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Pain score (verbal numeric rating scale) as the median VNRS at rest and cough

Time Frame: up to 24 hours

All patients will be assessed for pain score using the 11 points verbal numeric rating scale (VNRS), where zero equals no pain and 10 equals the worst pain imaginable. This assessment will be done before the block and after the block by 60 minutes and then every 6 hours up to 24 hours.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Pulmonary function test(up to 24 hours)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Rasha Hamed

Ass. Prof. in Anesthesia and ICU

Assiut University

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials