Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00292383
NCT00292383
Unknown
Phase 4

A Randomized, Prospective Multicenter Pilot Study to Determine the Influence of the Ventricular Pacing Site on the Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure in Patients With Indication for Permanent Pacemaker Stimulation Therapy.

Medtronic BRC3 sites in 1 country100 target enrollmentFebruary 15, 2006

Overview

Phase
Phase 4
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Atrioventricular Block
Sponsor
Medtronic BRC
Enrollment
100
Locations
3
Primary Endpoint
Amount of patients in which the ventricular lead position could be positioned successfully according randomization
Last Updated
14 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether there is a relationship between ventricular lead position and the incidence of heart failure and atrial fibrillation in patients with indication for permanent pacemaker stimulation.

Detailed Description

AV-Block of higher degree is the primary indication for pacing therapy for about 20% of pacemaker patients. Pacing systems with only ventricular stimulation (VVI and VDD) have a fraction of about 40% of all pacemakers in Germany. About 50% of the implanted pacemakers in Germany are dual-chamber pacemakers and one half of them is used for treatment of AV blocks. Picture 1: Fractions of pacing indications in Germany Picture 2: Fractions of used pacing modes in Germany /1/ A lot of studies proved in the past that the pacing site influenced the development of hemodynamics, heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF). Unfortunately, the results are not commonly applicable or statistically assured. Due to this, further examinations are required in order to get explicit statements regarding application of alternative, nonapical ventricular lead positioning. 1. Pilotphase It shall be determined whether a randomized positioning of ventricular leads at 2 defined positions (either Group A: Positioning at right ventricular apex or Group B:. Positioning at right ventricular high septum) is feasible. Included patients will already by examined and followed according to protocol. After having proved feasibility of randomized positioning, the data of these patients shall be used for evaluation of the V-PASS study. 2. Study Phase It shall be evaluated how far 2 defined different ventricular lead positions for permanent pacemaker therapy can influence the combined study endpoint mortality and clinically relevant symptoms of heart failure. Further more the development of hemodynamics and the incidence of atrial fibrillation shall be studied.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
February 15, 2006
End Date
December 2008
Last Updated
14 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Medtronic BRC

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients with an expected ventricular stimulation rate of \>60% in planned pacing therapy. This will be the following pacing indications
  • Symptomatic first-degree AV block, PQ time \>250ms
  • Second-degree Av block with permanent 2:1 conduction
  • Permanent third-degree AV block
  • Paroxysmal first-degree to third-degree Av block, with an anticipated rate of ventricular stimulation \>60%
  • Symptomatic bradyarrhythmia absoluta with permanent atrial fibrillation, with an anticipated rate of ventricular stimulation \>60%

Exclusion Criteria

  • heart failure acc. NYHA III or IV
  • Intra-atrial conduction delay (P-wave \> 150ms)
  • Myocardial infarction less then 6 months before pacemaker implant
  • hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy
  • Cardiogenic shock
  • pregnancy
  • Lactation period
  • Patients under 18 years of age

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Amount of patients in which the ventricular lead position could be positioned successfully according randomization

Secondary Outcomes

  • Atrial Fibrillation, AF burden >1%
  • Typical values re operation procedure in both groups
  • operation time, x-ray time
  • intraoperative measurements (amplitudes, thresholds)
  • broad QRS-complexes in both groups
  • safety of therapy, complications
  • electrical specific values in both groups
  • energy consumption, lead impedance
  • Rhythmologic characteristics in both groups
  • amount of VESs
  • episodes of ventricular tachycardia
  • amount of atrial and ventricular stimulation
  • BNP-levels in both groups
  • incidence of co-morbidities in both groups
  • Heart failure > NYHA II
  • Hospitalizations in both groups due to
  • Heart failure
  • Rhythm disorders

Study Sites (3)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials