Graded Activity Versus Supervised Exercises in Patients With Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain
- Conditions
- Low Back Pain
- Interventions
- Other: Graded ActivityOther: Supervised Exercises
- Registration Number
- NCT01719276
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Sao Paulo
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of graded activity program and supervised exercise on pain, functional disability, quality of life, global perceived effect, return to work, physical activity, physical capacity and strength of the lower limbs in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain
- Detailed Description
Objective: To contrast the efficacy of of graded activity program and supervised exercise on pain, functional disability, quality of life, global perceived effect, return to work, physical activity, physical capacity and strength of the lower limbs in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain
Design: Sixty-six will be randomized into two groups namely: Graded Activity program (GA)(n = 33) and supervised exercise (SE) (n = 33). The primary clinical outcomes will be pain, assessed with the numerical pain scale and McGill Pain Questionnaire, and disability assessed with Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire. Secondary outcomes will be measured with Global Perceived Effect, quality of life, return to work, physical activity, functional capacity and strength of the lower limbs. The program lasts for 6 weeks, and sessions happen twice a week, with duration of one hour each. Evaluations will be performed before(baseline), after (6weeks) and with a follow-up 3 and 6 months after treatment. Data will be collected by a blinded examiner who also had made the allocation of patients to groups. Significance level is established at 5%.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 66
- Patients with non-specific chronic low back pain for at least three months, age between 18 and 65 year of both genders and with a minimum pain intensity score of three in the 11-point Pain Numerical Rating Scale (ranging from 0 to 10 points).
-
Known or suspected serious spinal pathology (fractures, tumors, inflammatory or infective diseases of the spine);
- Nerve root compromise;
- Comorbid health conditions that would prevent active participation in the exercise programs;
- Pregnancy;
- Cardio Respiratory illnesses;
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Graded Activity Graded Activity Exercise treadmill, Strengthening of the lower limbs and trunk Supervised exercises Graded Activity Stretching, Strengthening, Motor Control Graded Activity Supervised Exercises Exercise treadmill, Strengthening of the lower limbs and trunk Supervised exercises Supervised Exercises Stretching, Strengthening, Motor Control
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Functional Disability 6 weeks Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire
Pain 6 weeks Pain Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and McGill Pain Questionnaire
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Return to work 6 weeks Patients will be asked if returned their professional activities.
Quality of life 6 weeks Short-Form Health Survey Questionnaire
Habitual physical activity 6 weeks The Baecke questionnaire on habitual physical activity
Physical Capacity 6 weeks physical capacity tests (sit-to-stand and 50-foot walk)
Global Perceived Effect 6 weeks Global Perceived Effect Scale
Kinesiophobia Tampa Scale of Kinesophobia (TSK) self-applied questionnaire consisting of 17 items, which was developed to measure the fear of movement due to cLBP. Each question has 4 response options (strongly disagree, disagree, agree, and strongly agree) with scores respectively ranging from 1 to 4 points.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Medicine School of the University Of São Paulo
🇧🇷São Paulo, Brazil