Comparison of Dentin Hypersensitivity Reduction Over a 1-month Period
- Conditions
- Dentin Sensitivity
- Registration Number
- NCT04351412
- Lead Sponsor
- King Abdulaziz University
- Brief Summary
Here we assessed the clinical effectiveness of Gluma, fluoride varnish, and the Tetric N-Bond one-step self-etch system in alleviating DH instantly and over 1 month, after a single topical application.A randomized, double-blind, clinical trial was conducted on 55 patients (25 males, 30 females; age: 20-49 years). Seventy teeth were randomly assigned to three groups: Gluma (n = 24); fluoride varnish (n = 23); and Tetric N-Bond adhesive (n = 23). Sensitivity to tactile, air blast, and cold stimuli were investigated.. A visual analogue scale was used to assess tactile stimuli, and the Schiff Cold Scale to assess air blast and cold stimuli. DH was evaluated immediately post-treatment, and at the 2-week and 1-month follow-up. Between-group and within-group comparisons were made.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 55
- Middle-aged adult population who usually complains of Dentin Hypersensitivity.
- Age range 20-49 years, that visit the dental hospital at King Abdul-Aziz university (KAUDH) who would have at least one or two teeth with DH
- Those with recession of the gingiva, teeth erosion or abrasion.
- Patients agreed to participate in the study.
- Patients going through professional desensitizing treatment during the previous three months; Using desensitizing tooth paste in the last two months
- Chronic; far on progress periodontal disease; treatment for periodontal disease;
- Teeth with ICDAS (International Caries Detection and Assessment System) score 4
- Teeth diagnosed for irreversible pulpitis; root canal treated teeth
- Teeth covered with crowns; bridge
- Teeth with cervical restorations interfering with the evaluation
- Medically compromised patients currently using medications like anticonvulsants, antihistamines, antidepressants, sedatives or daily analgesics.
- Pregnant or lactating women; were also excluded.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Assess dentine hypersensitivity score to stimuli immediately after treatment by intervention From baseline to immediately after treatment with intervention Scores of DH for tactile stimulus were recorded using visual analogue scale and for cold, and air blast stimuli using the Schiff Cold Air Sensitivity Scale 18 were recorded immediately after treatment with intervention and compared score to baseline.
Assess dentine hypersensitivity score to stimuli at Baseline Baseline before treatment Scores of DH for tactile stimulus were recorded using visual analogue scale and for cold, and air blast stimuli using the Schiff Cold Air Sensitivity Scale 18 at baseline.
Assess dentine hypersensitivity to stimuli at two-weeks follow up after treatment by intervention From baseline to two-weeks follow up after treatment with intervention Scores of DH for tactile stimulus were recorded using visual analogue scale and for cold, and air blast stimuli using the Schiff Cold Air Sensitivity Scale 18 were recorded at two-weeks follow up after treatment with intervention and compared score to baseline and immediate treatment scores.
Assess dentine hypersensitivity to stimuli at one month follow up after treatment by intervention From baseline to one month follow up after treatment with intervention Scores of DH for tactile stimulus were recorded using visual analogue scale and for cold, and air blast stimuli using the Schiff Cold Air Sensitivity Scale 18 were recorded at one month (30 days) follow up after treatment with intervention and compared score to baseline and immediate treatment, and two weeks follow up visit scores.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
King Abdulaziz University
🇸🇦Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
King Abdulaziz University🇸🇦Jeddah, Saudi Arabia