MedPath

Recombinant Human Platelet-derived Growth Factor in Combination With Collagen Matrix

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Gingival Recession
Platelet Derived Growth Factor
Interventions
Procedure: Root coverage procedures
Registration Number
NCT04462237
Lead Sponsor
University of Michigan
Brief Summary

The present randomized clinical trial is aimed at evaluating the efficacy of recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor in combination with collagen matrix for the treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions

Detailed Description

Despite the fact that gingival recession is most often a generalized condition rather than being localized to a single tooth, most of the data currently found in the literature pertains to the treatment of localized gingival recessions.

The gold standard treatment for this condition involves the use of an autogenous connective tissue graft, that is associated with increased patient morbidity.

Biomaterials have progressively gained popularity due to their advantages when compared to autogenous grafts, such as unrestricted availability, avoidance of a secondary surgical site, reduction of the surgical time, and the patient's preference.

Collagen matrix is one of the most used soft tissue substitute for the treatment of gingival recessions. Combining this scaffold material with a growth factor could enhance its outcomes. In particular, root coverage using platelet-derived growth factor can also promote regeneration of new cementum, periodontal ligament and bone.

Therefore, the aim of the present study is to investigate the effect of platelet-derived growth factor in combination with collagen matrix outcomes for the treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
30
Inclusion Criteria
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Periodontally and systemically healthy
  • Full-mouth plaque score and full-mouth bleeding score ≤ 20% (measured at four sites per tooth)
  • At least two multiple adjacent gingival recessions (with at least one 2 mm or deeper) requiring surgical intervention for root coverage
  • No interproximal attachment/bone loss
  • No prior experience of root coverage procedures within the last 1 year
  • The patient must be able to perform good oral hygiene
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Contraindications for periodontal surgery
  • Patients pregnant or attempting to get pregnant (self-reported)
  • Untreated periodontitis
  • Persistence of uncorrected gingival trauma from traumatic toothbrushing
  • Interdental attachment loss greater than 1 mm or furcation involvement in the teeth to be treated
  • Presence of severe tooth malposition, rotation or clinically significant super-eruption
  • Self-reported current smoking more than 10 cigarettes/day or pipe or cigar smoking
  • Allergy to collagen-based medical products
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
collagen matrix aloneRoot coverage proceduresRoot coverage procedure using collagen matrix alone (without the use of the platelet-derived growth factor) for the treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions
collagen matrix + platelet-derived growth factorRoot coverage proceduresRoot coverage procedure using collagen matrix + platelet-derived growth factor for the treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Mean Root Coverage6 months

amount of recession reduction compared to the baseline recession depth

Keratinized tissue width gain6 months

amount of keratinized tissue width gain from the baseline

Gingival thickness gain6 months

amount of gingival thickness gain from the baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Tissue perfusion variations6 months

Tissue perfusion variations compared to baseline at the different follow-up using ultrasonography

3D volumetric changes6 months

Soft tissue volumetric variation evaluated with digital softwares

Esthetic outcomes6 months

evaluated using the root coverage esthetic score (from 0 to 10)

Patient-related outcomes6 months

Patient self reported perception of the procedure in terms of morbidity, satisfaction and esthetic outcomes. Visual analogue scales (from 0 to 100) will be used to assess these outcomes

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University of Michigan School of Dentistry

🇺🇸

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath