Multiple doses versus single dose of cefazolin to prevent periprosthetic joint infection after revision arthroplasty: a multicenter open-label, randomized clinical trial
Phase 4
Completed
- Conditions
- joint infectionprosthetic joint infection1000401810005944
- Registration Number
- NL-OMON48292
- Lead Sponsor
- Sint Maartenskliniek
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 780
Inclusion Criteria
planned revision arthroplasty of the prosthesis of the hip or knee for
non-infectious reason
Exclusion Criteria
periprosthetic joint infection on baseline
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method <p>The primary endpoint is the difference in proportion of infection-free implant<br /><br>survival between the study groups within 1 year of follow-up, as assessed by<br /><br>the independent Data Review Committee, in the mITT population. </p><br>
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method <p>The secondary objectives include the determination of the incidence, risk<br /><br>factors, treatment outcome and prognosis of SSI and PJI during follow-up. The<br /><br>safety and tolerance of the regimens, and the antimicrobial susceptibility<br /><br>patterns of microorganisms will be described. Patient reported outcome measures<br /><br>(PROMs) will be used to evaluate physical performance and satisfaction of<br /><br>subjects within 1 year after the index revision arthroplasty. A cost-utility<br /><br>analysis will only be performed when the primary outcome has demonstrated<br /><br>superiority of the extended regimen. </p><br>