Optimizing a Mobile Transdiagnostic Emotion Regulation Intervention for University Students: A Micro Randomized Trial
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Completed
- Sponsor
- Erasmus University Rotterdam
- Enrollment
- 161
- Locations
- 2
- Primary Endpoint
- Objective engagement patterns: Engagement metrics
Study Overview
Brief Summary
This study will explore the functioning of a mobile transdiagnostic emotion regulation intervention designed for university students to optimize the uptake and the effectiveness of the intervention.
Detailed Description
It is estimated that globally between 12 and 50% of all university students are affected by mental health problems, the most common ones being anxiety, depression, and substance abuse. Over the past years online-based interventions have been spotlighted by researchers and clinicians as an avenue for a better outreach and provision of low threshold interventions aimed at primary and secondary prevention of mental health problems among the university students population.
As part of a student wellbeing program at the Erasmus University Rotterdam (EUR), a transdiagnostic mobile intervention consisting of a suite of preventative self-guided tools is being developed. Its' goal is to help students better manage their mental health by teaching them adaptive emotional regulation strategies.
The intervention includes exercises from different therapeutic approaches, and targets transdiagnostic factors such as negative self-referential thoughts, rumination, experiences of prolonged negative emotional states, and mental health literacy. The intervention is delivered via a smartphone and consists of 20 therapeutic exercises teaching students strategies like upregulation of positive affect, staying present in the moment, cognitive defusion, relaxation and breathing techniques, and self compassion skills.
The main goals of the study are to evaluate whether the intervention and its components have the intended effects on student's emotional states as well as get insight into students' engagement patterns and experience with the intervention. This will be done by utilizing an explanatory sequential mixed methods approach combining novel methods of online-intervention assessment, specifically Micro Randomized Trials (MRT) with semi-structured interviews, which will provide information on the lived experiences of the participants with the intervention and provide explanation of the quantitative results. The results of this trial will support the optimization and further development of the mobile application that will later be evaluated for its full-scale effectiveness.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Na
- Intervention Model
- Single Group
- Primary Purpose
- Prevention
- Masking
- None
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18 Years to 27 Years (Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Inclusion Criteria
- •Willing to provide informed consent
- •Currently enrolled as a student at the Erasmus University Rotterdam
- •Own a smartphone with an active phone number
- •Feel comfortable speaking and writing in the English language
- •Having a score between 5 (mild) and 19 (moderately severe) on the PHQ-9
Exclusion Criteria
- •Participants are not eligible for this study if they:
- •Experience significant suicidal thoughts over the past month
- •Have a medical diagnosis of psychosis or bipolar disorder, severe clinical depression or anxiety disorder
- •Are undergoing psychopharmacological treatment or treatment with experimental drugs
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Objective engagement patterns: Engagement metrics
Time Frame: Day 2 - day 22
Objective engagement patterns with the intervention will be assessed using descriptive statistics of engagement metrics (i.e., exercise completion rates, average time spent, and times of the day where participants completed the exercises) per exercise and exercise category. In addition, a correlational analysis will be used to evaluate whether there is a relationship between time of the day and exercise completion rates.
Objective engagement patterns: Relationship between time of the day and exercise completion
Time Frame: Day 2 - day 22
A correlational analysis will be used to evaluate whether there is a relationship between the time of the day participants engaged in an exercise and exercise completion rates.
Changes in a momentary emotional state
Time Frame: Day 2 - day 22
Participants will be asked to evaluate seven emotional states before and after engaging in the ER intervention or control intervention by answering the question: "How \[affect (e.g., happy)\] do you feel at the moment?" Each of 7 emotional states is evaluated on a scale from 1 \[Not at all\] to 5 \[Extremely\]. The emotional states are combined into 2 categories of affect: negative (stressed, frustrated, sad, fatigued) and positive (happy, energetic, relaxed). Changes in the momentary emotional states (i.e., positive and negative affect) will be evaluated by looking at the responses on the pre and post EMA in the relation to whether a participant received an ER intervention or health information.
Subjective engagement patterns: Exercise likeability and helpfulness
Time Frame: Day 2 - day 22
Subjective engagement patterns will be evaluated by combining exercise likeability and helpfulness ratings with information from the semi-structured interviews. Exercise likeability and helpfulness are assessed with items rated on a scale from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much): "How much did you like the exercise?" "How helpful did you find the exercise?"
Subjective engagement patterns: User experience
Time Frame: Up to 3 weeks upon completion of the Micro Randomized Trial
Semi-structured interviews will be conducted with a subsample of participants (n=21) within three weeks upon completion of the MRT. University students will be asked to report on their general experience with intervention as well as intervention categories and separate exercises. Example questions are: "What do you think about the intervention?", "What kind of difficulties did you experience while using it?",
Changes in thought believability and discomfort after engaging in CD exercise
Time Frame: Day 2 - day 22
When randomized to CD exercise, participants will be asked to evaluate their self-selected unhelpful thought answering the following questions on a scale from 1 (not at all uncomfortable/believable) to 100 (extremely uncomfortable / believable) before and after the exercise: "How uncomfortable is the thought?" "How believable (true) is the thought?" The effects of CD exercises will be assessed by comparing the pre and post scores on the two thought parameters.
Secondary Outcomes
- Changes in Depressive symptoms(At the baseline and day 23)
- Changes in Anxiety symptoms(At the baseline and day 23)
- Changes in stress levels(At the baseline and day 23)
- Changes in ER skills(At the baseline and day 23)
Investigators
Marilisa Boffo
Assistant Professor in Clinical Psychology and eHealth,
Erasmus University Rotterdam