MedPath

Duration of hSBA Response After a Primary Series of Bivalent rLP2086 Followed by a Booster Dose

Phase 3
Completed
Conditions
Meningococcal Infection
Interventions
Procedure: blood sampling
Drug: bivalent rLP2086
Registration Number
NCT01543087
Lead Sponsor
Pfizer
Brief Summary

This study is to assess the longevity of immune response in adolescents for approximately 48 months after receipt of a primary series of bivalent rLP2086 vaccination, which is then followed by a booster dose and an assessment of immune response for 12 or 26 months post booster vaccination.

Detailed Description

This study is to assess the longevity of immune responses in adolescents (aged 10 to \<19 years at the time of entry into a primary study) following receipt of a vaccination regimen of 2 or 3 doses of bivalent rLP2086 in a primary study. A booster dose of bivalent rLP2086 at approximately 48 months was given following the final dose of the 2- or 3-dose primary bivalent rLP2086 vaccination series. The study was therefore divided into Stage 1 (4-year persistence of immune responses following receipt of a primary vaccination series) and the booster stage (follow-up through 12 months for all boosted or 26 months for a subset of the boosted).

Subjects participating only in Stage 1 will attend up to 6 study visits for collection of a 20-mL blood sample at each visit. Subjects participating in both Stage 1 and booster stage will attend up to 9-10 study visits with 1 visit for booster dose vaccination and 8-9 visits for collection of a 20-mL blood sample at each visit.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
698
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
One group of subjectsblood sampling-
One group of subjectsbivalent rLP2086-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percentage of Participants in Stage 1 Achieving hSBA Titer Level Greater Than or Equal to (>=) Lower Limit of Quantitation (LLOQ) for Each of the 4 Primary Strains at Month 6 (Visit 1) After Primary VaccinationsMonth 6 (Visit 1 of study B1971033)

For immunogenicity assessment, serum bactericidal assay using human complement (hSBA) was performed with 4 primary Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B (MnB) test strains. Percentage of participants achieving hSBA titer \>= LLOQ were computed along with corresponding 2-sided 95 percent (%) confidence interval (CIs). LLOQ was 1:16 for PMB80 (A22) and 1:8 for PMB2001 (A56), PMB2948 (B24) and PMB2707 (B44). Participants who received bivalent rLP2086 in primary study B1971012, entered in this study at Month 12 (Visit 2). Hence, no participants enrolled from primary study B1971012 had serology results at Month 6.

Percentage of Participants in Stage 1 Achieving hSBA Titer Level Greater Than or Equal to (>=) Lower Limit of Quantitation (LLOQ) for Each of the 4 Primary Strains at Month 12 (Visit 2) After Primary VaccinationsMonth 12 (Visit 2 of study B1971033)

For immunogenicity assessment, hSBA was performed with 4 primary MnB test strains. Percentage of participants achieving hSBA titer \>= LLOQ were computed along with corresponding 2-sided 95 % CIs. LLOQ was 1:16 for PMB80 (A22) and 1:8 for PMB2001 (A56), PMB2948 (B24) and PMB2707 (B44).

Percentage of Participants in Stage 1 Achieving hSBA Titer Level Greater Than or Equal to (>=) Lower Limit of Quantitation (LLOQ) for Each of the 4 Primary Strains at Month 18 (Visit 3) After Primary VaccinationsMonth 18 (Visit 3 of study B1971033)

For immunogenicity assessment, hSBA was performed with 4 primary MnB test strains. Percentage of participants achieving hSBA titer \>= LLOQ were computed along with corresponding 2-sided 95 % CIs. LLOQ was 1:16 for PMB80 (A22) and 1:8 for PMB2001 (A56), PMB2948 (B24) and PMB2707 (B44).

Percentage of Participants in Stage 1 Achieving hSBA Titer Level Greater Than or Equal to (>=) Lower Limit of Quantitation (LLOQ) for Each of the 4 Primary Strains at Month 24 (Visit 4) After Primary VaccinationsMonth 24 (Visit 4 of study B1971033)

For immunogenicity assessment, hSBA was performed with 4 primary MnB test strains. Percentage of participants achieving hSBA titer \>= LLOQ were computed along with corresponding 2-sided 95 % CIs. LLOQ was 1:16 for PMB80 (A22) and 1:8 for PMB2001 (A56), PMB2948 (B24) and PMB2707 (B44).

Percentage of Participants in Stage 1 Achieving hSBA Titer Level Greater Than or Equal to (>=) Lower Limit of Quantitation (LLOQ) for Each of the 4 Primary Strains at Month 36 (Visit 5) After Primary VaccinationsMonth 36 (Visit 5 of study B1971033)

For immunogenicity assessment, hSBA was performed with 4 primary MnB test strains. Percentage of participants achieving hSBA titer \>= LLOQ were computed along with corresponding 2-sided 95 % CIs. LLOQ was 1:16 for PMB80 (A22) and 1:8 for PMB2001 (A56), PMB2948 (B24) and PMB2707 (B44).

Percentage of Participants in Stage 1 Achieving hSBA Titer Level Greater Than or Equal to (>=) Lower Limit of Quantitation (LLOQ) for Each of the 4 Primary Strains at Month 48 (Visit 6) After Primary VaccinationsMonth 48 (Visit 6 of study B1971033)

For immunogenicity assessment, hSBA was performed with 4 primary MnB test strains. Percentage of participants achieving hSBA titer \>= LLOQ were computed along with corresponding 2-sided 95 % CIs. LLOQ was 1:16 for PMB80 (A22) and 1:8 for PMB2001 (A56), PMB2948 (B24) and PMB2707 (B44).

Percentage of Booster Stage Participants Achieving hSBA Titer Level Greater Than or Equal to (>=) Lower Limit of Quantitation (LLOQ) for Each of the 4 Primary Strains 1 Month After Last Vaccination in Primary Study1 month after last vaccination in primary study

For immunogenicity assessment, hSBA was performed with 4 primary MnB test strains. Percentage of participants achieving hSBA titer \>= LLOQ were computed along with corresponding 2-sided 95 % CIs. LLOQ was 1:16 for PMB80 (A22) and 1:8 for PMB2001 (A56), PMB2948 (B24) and PMB2707 (B44). Participants of Group 3c (participants from primary study B1971015) were not continued in booster stage.

Percentage of Booster Stage Participants Achieving hSBA Titer Level (>=) Lower Limit of Quantitation for Each of the 4 Primary Strains Before Booster Vaccination (48 Months After Last Vaccination in Primary Study [Visit 6])Visit 6 of study B1971033 (48 months after last vaccination in primary study)

For immunogenicity assessment, hSBA was performed with 4 primary MnB test strains. Percentage of participants achieving hSBA titer \>= LLOQ were computed along with corresponding 2-sided 95 % CIs. LLOQ was 1:16 for PMB80 (A22) and 1:8 for PMB2001 (A56), PMB2948 (B24) and PMB2707 (B44). Participants of Group 3c (participants from primary study B1971015) were not continued in booster stage.

Percentage of Participants Achieving hSBA Titer Level Greater Than or Equal to (>=) Lower Limit of Quantitation (LLOQ) for Each of the 4 Primary Strains 1 Month After the Booster Vaccination (Visit 8)Visit 8 (1 month following the booster vaccination on Month 49)

For immunogenicity assessment, hSBA was performed with 4 primary MnB test strains. Percentage of participants achieving hSBA titer \>= LLOQ were computed along with corresponding 2-sided 95 % CIs. LLOQ was 1:16 for PMB80 (A22) and 1:8 for PMB2001 (A56), PMB2948 (B24) and PMB2707 (B44). Participants of Group 3c (participants from primary study B1971015) were not continued in booster stage.

Percentage of Participants Achieving hSBATiter Level Greater Than or Equal to (>=) Lower Limit of Quantitation (LLOQ) for Each of the 4 Primary Strains 12 Months After the Booster Vaccination(Visit 10)Visit 10 (12 months following the booster vaccination on Month 60)

For immunogenicity assessment, hSBA was performed with 4 primary MnB test strains. Percentage of participants achieving hSBA titer \>= LLOQ were computed along with corresponding 2-sided 95 % CIs. LLOQ was 1:16 for PMB80 (A22) and 1:8 for PMB2001 (A56), PMB2948 (B24) and PMB2707 (B44). Participants of Group 3c (participants from primary study B1971015) were not continued in booster stage.

Percentage of Participants Achieving hSBA Titer Level Greater Than or Equal to(>=) Lower Limit of Quantitation (LLOQ) for Each of the 4 Primary Strains 26 Months After the Booster Vaccination(Visit 11)Visit 11 (26 months following the booster vaccination on Month 74)

For immunogenicity assessment, hSBA was performed with 4 primary MnB test strains. Percentage of participants achieving hSBA titer \>= LLOQ were computed along with corresponding 2-sided 95 % CIs. LLOQ was 1:16 for PMB80 (A22) and 1:8 for PMB2001 (A56), PMB2948 (B24) and PMB2707 (B44). Participants of Group 3c (participants from primary study B1971015) were not continued in booster stage. only participants who received bivalent rLP2086 in primary study B1971010 were not analysed for this endpoint. Only participants who received bivalent rLP2086 in primary study B1971012 on a 0-, 2-, and 6-month or a 0- and 6-month vaccination schedule were eligible to be followed for 26 months after booster vaccination

Percentage of Participants Reporting Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Booster VaccinationWithin 7 days after booster vaccination on Month 48

Local reactions were collected by using an e-diary and included pain at injection site, redness and swelling. Redness and swelling were graded as: none (0-2.0 centimetre \[cm\]), mild (2.5-5.0 cm), moderate (greater than \[\>\] 5.0-10.0 cm) and severe (\>10.0 cm). Pain was graded as: mild (does not interfere with activity), moderate (Interferes with activity) and severe (prevents daily activity).

Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events and Antipyretic Use Within 7 Days After Booster VaccinationWithin 7 days after booster vaccination on Month 48

Systemic reactions included: fever, vomiting, diarrhea, headache, fatigue, chills, muscle pain other than muscle pain at the injection site and joint pain, all other systemic reactions were recorded by using an e-diary. Fever was categorized as: 38.0 to 38.4 degree Celsius (C), 38.5 to 38.9 degree C, 39.0 to 40.0 degree C and \> 40.0 degree C. Vomiting was graded as: mild (1 to 2 times in 24 hours \[hrs\]), moderate (\>2 times in 24 hrs) and severe (requires intravenous \[IV\] hydration); Diarrhea was graded as: mild (2 to 3 loose stools in 24 hrs), moderate (4 to 5 loose stools in 24 hrs) and severe (6 or more loose stools in 24 hrs); Headache, fatigue, chills, muscle pain and joint pain was graded as: mild (does not interfere with daily activities), moderate (some interference with activity) and severe (prevents daily routine activity).

Number of Days Participants Missed Work or School Due to AE From Booster Vaccination Through 6 Months After Booster Vaccination (Visit 7 Through Visit 9)From Visit 7 (time of booster vaccination, Month 48) Through Visit 9 (6 months after booster vaccination, Month 54)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received investigational product without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Number of days participants missed work or school due to AE occurred following booster vaccination were reported here.

Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Adverse Event (AE), Serious Adverse Event (SAE), Newly Diagnosed Chronic Medical Condition (NDCMC) and Medically Attended Adverse Event (MAE) From Booster Vaccination Phase (Visit 7 to Visit 8)From Visit 7 (Month 48) to Visit 8 (Month 49) in Booster stage

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received investigational product without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. AEs included both non-serious AEs and serious adverse events (SAEs). An NDCMC was defined as a disease or medical condition, that was not identified previously and that was expected to be persistent or otherwise long-lasting in its effects. The investigator determined if the AE was an NDCMC. An MAE was defined as a non serious AE (AE other than SAE) that resulted in an evaluation at a medical facility.

Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Serious Adverse Event (SAE) and Medically Attended Adverse Event (MAE) From Booster Follow-Up Phase (Visit 8 to Visit 9)Visit 8 (Month 49) to Visit 9 (Month 54) in Booster stage

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received investigational product without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. An MAE was defined as a non serious AE (AE other than SAE) that resulted in an evaluation at a medical facility.

Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Serious Adverse Event (SAE) and Medically Attended Adverse Event (MAE) From Booster Vaccination Through 6 Months After Booster Vaccination (Visit 7 to Visit 9)From Visit 7 (time of booster vaccination, Month 48) to Visit 9 (6 months after booster vaccination, Month 54)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received investigational product without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. An MAE was defined as a nonserious AE (AE other than SAE) that resulted in an evaluation at a medical facility.

Percentage of Participants With Newly Diagnosed Chronic Medical Condition;(NDCMC) From the 6-Month Safety Telephone Call in the Primary Study Through 48 Months After the Last Dose in the Primary Study (Visit 6 in Stage 1)Visit 1 of B1971033 (6-month safety telephone call after last dose in primary study) to Visit 6 of B1971033 (6 months after last primary dose to 48 months after last primary dose in primary study)

An NDCMC was defined as a disease or medical condition, that was not identified previously and that was expected to be persistent or otherwise long-lasting in its effects. The investigator determined if the AE was an NDCMC.

Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Newly Diagnosed Chronic Medical Condition (NDCMC) From 1 Month After Booster Vaccination Through 12 Months After Booster Vaccination (Visit 8 to Visit 10)From Visit 8 (1 month after booster vaccination, Month 49) to Visit 10 (12 months after booster vaccination, Month 60)

An NDCMC was defined as a disease or medical condition, that was not identified previously and that was expected to be persistent or otherwise long-lasting in its effects. The investigator determined if the AE was an NDCMC.

Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Newly Diagnosed Chronic Medical Condition (NDCMC) From Booster Stage Vaccination Through 12 Months After Booster Vaccination (Visit 7 to Visit 10)From Visit 7 (time of booster vaccination, Month 48) to Visit 10 (12 months after booster vaccination, Month 60)

An NDCMC was defined as a disease or medical condition, that was not identified previously and that was expected to be persistent or otherwise long-lasting in its effects. The investigator determined if the AE was an NDCMC.

Percentage of Participants With Newly Diagnosed Chronic Medical Condition (NDCMC) From 1 Month After Booster Vaccination Through 26 Months After Booster Vaccination (Visit 8 to Visit 11)From Visit 8 (1 month after booster vaccination, Month 49) to Visit 11 (26 months after booster vaccination, Month 74)

An NDCMC was defined as a disease or medical condition, that was not identified previously and that was expected to be persistent or otherwise long-lasting in its effects. The investigator determined if the AE was an NDCMC. Participants who received bivalent rLP2086 in primary study B1971012 on a 0-, 2-, and 6-month or a 0- and 6-month vaccination schedule were eligible to be follow up for 26 months after booster vaccination.

Percentage of Participants With Newly Diagnosed Chronic Medical Condition (NDCMC) From Booster Vaccine Through 26 Months After Booster Vaccination (Visit 7 to Visit 11)From Visit 7 (time of booster vaccination, Month 48) to Visit 11 (26 months after booster vaccination, Month 74)

An NDCMC was defined as a disease or medical condition, that was not identified previously and that was expected to be persistent or otherwise long-lasting in its effects. The investigator determined if the AE was an NDCMC. Participants who received bivalent rLP2086 in primary study B1971012 on a 0-, 2-, and 6-month or a 0- and 6-month vaccination schedule were eligible to be follow up for 26 months after booster vaccination.

Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Immediate Adverse Event (AE) After Booster VaccinationWithin 30 minutes after Booster Vaccination in Month 48

Immediate AE was defined as AEs occurring within the first 30 minutes after investigational product administration. An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received investigational product without regard to possibility of causal relationship.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (46)

Dr. Shelly David Senders MD Inc. dba Senders Pediatrics

🇺🇸

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Tampere Vaccine Research Clinic

🇫🇮

Tampere, Finland

Clinical Research Advantage, Inc./ East Valley Family Physicians, PLC

🇺🇸

Chandler, Arizona, United States

St. Joseph Heritage Healthcare

🇺🇸

Huntington Beach, California, United States

Center For Clinical Trials, LLC

🇺🇸

Paramount, California, United States

Clinical Research Advantage, Inc. / East Valley Family Physicians, PLC

🇺🇸

Chandler, Arizona, United States

Advanced Clinical Research

🇺🇸

West Jordan, Utah, United States

North Georgia Research Clinical Center

🇺🇸

Dalton, Georgia, United States

Clinical Research Advantage, Inc.

🇺🇸

Council Bluffs, Iowa, United States

Bayview Research Group

🇺🇸

Valley Village, California, United States

Kentucky Pediatric/Adult Research

🇺🇸

Bardstown, Kentucky, United States

Kinder - und Jugendarzt Praxis

🇩🇪

Bad Saulgau, Germany

Southwestern Medical Clinic Lakeland Healthcare Affiliate

🇺🇸

Stevensville, Michigan, United States

Midwest Children's Health Research Institute

🇺🇸

Lincoln, Nebraska, United States

Ohio Pediatrics, Inc

🇺🇸

Dayton, Ohio, United States

Clinical Research Center of Nevada,LLC

🇺🇸

Henderson, Nevada, United States

J. Lewis Research Inc, Jordan River Family Medicine

🇺🇸

South Jordan, Utah, United States

Pori Vaccine Research Clinic

🇫🇮

Pori, Finland

Turku Vaccine Research Clinic

🇫🇮

Turku, Finland

Skanes Universitetssjukhus

🇸🇪

Malmo, Sweden

Clinical Research Advantage, Inc. (Prairie Fields Family Medicine, PC)

🇺🇸

Fremont, Nebraska, United States

Kinderarzt Praxis

🇩🇪

Bramsche, Germany

Pediatrics And Adolescent Medicine, P.A.

🇺🇸

Woodstock, Georgia, United States

Heartland Research Associates, LLC

🇺🇸

Augusta, Kansas, United States

Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, PA

🇺🇸

Marietta, Georgia, United States

Ohio Pediatric Research Association

🇺🇸

Dayton, Ohio, United States

Monroe Clinic

🇺🇸

Monroe, Wisconsin, United States

The Vancouver Clinic, Inc. PS

🇺🇸

Vancouver, Washington, United States

Research and Education Association for Clinical Health, Inc.

🇺🇸

Monroe, Wisconsin, United States

Ordinace praktickeho lekare pro deti a dorost

🇨🇿

Sezemice, Czechia

Fakultni nemocnice Hradec Kralove

🇨🇿

Hradec Kralove, Czechia

Infektionskliniken Malarsjukhuset

🇸🇪

Eskilstuna, Sweden

Aarhus University hospital Skejby

🇩🇰

Aarhus N, Denmark

Jarvenpaa Vaccine Research Clinic

🇫🇮

Jarvenpaa, Finland

California Research Foundation

🇺🇸

San Diego, California, United States

Bluegrass Clinical Research, Inc.

🇺🇸

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

The Center For Pharmaceutical Research

🇺🇸

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

USF Health South Tampa Center for Advanced Healthcare

🇺🇸

Tampa, Florida, United States

USF Health

🇺🇸

Tampa, Florida, United States

Brownsboro Park Pediatrics

🇺🇸

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

U of L Pediatrics: Downtown

🇺🇸

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Creighton University Pediatric Infectious Diseases

🇺🇸

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

West Houston Clinical Research Service (WHCRS)

🇺🇸

Houston, Texas, United States

J. Lewis Research, Inc. / Foothill Family Clinic

🇺🇸

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

J. Lewis Research, Inc. / Foothill Family Clinic South

🇺🇸

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

BB Holdings, LLC., dba Jean Brown Research

🇺🇸

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath