跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02838459
NCT02838459已完成不适用

Can Prediction Models Triage Trauma Patients More Accurately Than Clinicians?

Karolinska Institutet1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 5,155 人开始时间: 2016年7月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
5,155
试验地点
1
主要终点
30-day mortality

研究概览

简要总结

Using a prospective cohort design, the aim of this study is to compare the performance of clinicians with prediction models in triaging trauma patients.

详细描述

Title Can prediction models triage trauma patients more accurately than clinicians?

Background Nearly 5 million people die because of trauma each year. Hence trauma, defined as external injury combined with the body's associated response, is a major contributor to health issues globally. Trauma's time sensitive nature differentiates it from other health conditions. Therefore, prioritisation is crucial to treat the most urgent trauma cases first. This prioritisation is generally referred to as triage. Henceforth, formalized and non-formalized triage systems are distinguished between, where the former is defined as explicit triage consciously performed according to a priori determined criteria, and the latter as decisions on prioritisation by clinicians subconsciously taken in the absence of formalized triage.

There are two conceptually different methods currently used to triage trauma patients. Triage may be done by clinicians. Triage performed by clinicians may be affected by human factors such as tiredness and experience, yet may be viewed as the most morally appropriate method to triage trauma patients. Algorithms, such as statistical algorithms, may also be constructed for triage purpose. To predict the possibility of a certain outcome using statistical methods is called prediction modelling. Algorithms exclude human factors when triaging patients. However, algorithmic triaging may seem morally inappropriate due to the absence of human connection between the clinician and the patient.

Formalised triage systems are frequently used in trauma care in high income countries. Such systems are believed to have improved trauma care and hence trauma patient outcome. However, more than 90 per cent of all deaths due to trauma occur in low- and middle income countries, where formalised triage systems are uncommon to non-existing. Formalized triage systems may help strengthen trauma care in low - and middle income countries. However, research is lacking on whether algorithms or clinicians perform the most accurate in triaging patients.

Aim To compare the performance of prediction models with clinicians in trauma patient triage.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Having any of the external causes of mortality and morbidity listed in block V01-Y36, chapter XX of International Classification of Disease Version 10 (ICD-10) codebook as primary complaint

排除标准

  • 未提供

结局指标

主要结局

30-day mortality

时间窗: 30 days

Defined as mortality within 30 days of arrival to hospital

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Martin Gerdin

Researcher

Karolinska Institutet

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Can Prediction Models Triage Trauma Patients More... | 临床试验