MedPath

Investigation of Central Sensitization Frequency and Related Factors in Axial Spondyloarthritis Patients

Completed
Conditions
Central Sensitisation
Axial Spondyloarthritis
Interventions
Diagnostic Test: Pressure pain threshold
Diagnostic Test: Temporal summation
Diagnostic Test: Conditioned pain modulation
Diagnostic Test: Central Sensitization Inventory
Other: Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index
Other: Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life
Other: Istanbul Low Back Pain Disability Index
Other: Beck Depression Inventory
Other: Fatigue Severity Scale
Other: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
Other: Fibromyalgia Rapid Screening Tool
Other: Visual analogue scale
Registration Number
NCT04485078
Lead Sponsor
Marmara University
Brief Summary

The term axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) describes a group of chronic inflammatory diseases that characterized with spinal involvement. AxSpA is one of the most common rheumatic diseases and chronic pain and morning stiffness are the main complaints of these patients. Central sensitization is defined as increased response to normal or sub-threshold stimuli of central nervous system and its close relationship with many rheumatological diseases has been demonstrated in several studies. Pain in axSpA patients is generally considered as a result of increased inflammatory burden and structural changes, However, failure to adequate analgesia in every patient whose inflammation is suppressed with anti-inflammatory treatment suggests new pain mechanisms. Central sensitization (CS) is one of these mechanisms and its recognition is only possible by detailed evaluation of the patient. There is no method for the diagnosis of central sensitization is accepted as a gold standard. clinical scales and quantitative sensory testing (QST) widely is used for this purpose widely. The most commonly used QST types include pressure pain threshold (PPT), temporal summation (TS) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM). The well-known scale used for the evaluation of central sensitization is the Central Sensitization Inventory , developed by Mayer et.al in 2011 for detect central sensitization in chronic pain patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the frequency of central sensitization (CS) in patients with axSpA by means of clinical scales and quantitative sensory testing (QST), to examine related comorbidities and the parameters associated with the development of sensitization in these patients.

Detailed Description

The term axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) describes a group of chronic inflammatory diseases that characterized with spinal involvement. AxSpA is one of the most common rheumatic diseases and chronic pain and morning stiffness are the main complaints of these patients. Central sensitization (CS) is defined as increased response to normal or sub-threshold stimuli of central nervous system and its close relationship with many rheumatological diseases has been demonstrated in several studies. However, data associated with central sensitization in axSpA patients is very limited. The quantitative sensory testing (QST) is commonly used for detection hyperalgesia and allodynia those are accepted main findings in sensitized patients. The most commonly used QST types include pressure pain threshold (PPT), temporal summation (TS) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM).Pressure pain threshold measurement is frequently used to show local / generalized sensitivity increase in patients who develop pain sensitization. For this purpose, the pain response of superficial or deep tissue can be evaluated through mechanical device called algometer. The algometer probe was placed vertically in the each selected point and pressure was increased until the participant reporting pressure became painful. The first pressure value at which pain is felt is considered the PPT of that point. TS is defined as a progressive increase in pain response with repetitive painful stimuli. This condition is also known as wind-up phenomenon and play a role to development CS. CPM, known as one of the main mechanisms of endogenous analgesia, is based on the principle that pain perception can be reduced with painful stimulus applied to different areas according to the "pain inhibits pain" model. In the CPM testing, it is aimed to investigate the modulator effect of two different painful stimuli on each other. The diagnosis of CS can be made with QST or with Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI). The aim of this study is to evaluate the frequency of central sensitization (CS) in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA) by means of clinical scales and quantitative sensory testing (QST), to examine related comorbidities and the parameters associated with the development of sensitization in these patients. The patients with AxSpa and healthy controls will be included in this study. QST which consists of pressure pain threshold (PPT), temporal summation (TS) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) will be applied to the patient and control groups. Disease activity (BASDAI), functional status (ASQoL, ILBPDI), sleep quality (PSQI), pain (VAS pain), depression (BDI) and fatigue (FSS) will be assessed. Fibromyalgia (FIRST) and other comorbidities will be investigated. Patients will be divided as the ones with and without CS according to the central sensitization inventory (CSI) and the results will be compared. After data collection, analysis will be performed with the appropriate statistical method

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
150
Inclusion Criteria

Diagnosed with axSpA according to the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) criteria Aged between 18-65 years

Exclusion Criteria

Had an other rheumatic diseases, peripheral vascular disease, peripheral neuropathy and spine disease (e.g., symptomatic herniated disc, spinal stenosis), Using centrally acting pain medications (e.g., pregabaline, duloxetine, opioids) or glucocorticoids (>10 mg prednisone or its equivalent) within 3 months of study enrollment

The exclusion criteria of the control grup were same as that of the patients.

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Axial spondyloarthritis patientsTemporal summationQST with clinical scales
Axial spondyloarthritis patientsCentral Sensitization InventoryQST with clinical scales
Axial spondyloarthritis patientsBath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity IndexQST with clinical scales
Axial spondyloarthritis patientsVisual analogue scaleQST with clinical scales
Axial spondyloarthritis patientsConditioned pain modulationQST with clinical scales
Axial spondyloarthritis patientsAnkylosing Spondylitis Quality of LifeQST with clinical scales
Axial spondyloarthritis patientsFatigue Severity ScaleQST with clinical scales
Axial spondyloarthritis patientsPressure pain thresholdQST with clinical scales
Axial spondyloarthritis patientsBeck Depression InventoryQST with clinical scales
Axial spondyloarthritis patientsFibromyalgia Rapid Screening ToolQST with clinical scales
Axial spondyloarthritis patientsIstanbul Low Back Pain Disability IndexQST with clinical scales
Axial spondyloarthritis patientsPittsburgh Sleep Quality IndexQST with clinical scales
Healthy controlsTemporal summationQST
Healthy controlsPressure pain thresholdQST
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI)3 months

25 somatic and psychosocial symptoms, which are frequently found in patients with central sensitization in part A, are questioned. In part B, the presence of diseases whose relationship with central sensitization is well defined is questioned in the patient without participating in scoring. Central sensitization is assumed in patients who score 40 or more over 100 points.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Temporal summation3 months

TS scores will be evaluated over the trapezius muscle, sacroiliac joints, C7, T6, and L3 spine. TS scores will be calculated for each spine as the sum of three values which measured over the spinous process and 2 cm right and left side of corresponding level. In the evaluation of TS, a pressure as much the PPT value of each point will be applied with pain pressure algometer ten times with a 1-second interstimulus interval. Patients will ve asked to rate their pain using visual analogue scale (VAS) at 0, 5, and 10 seconds. TS will be calculated by subtracting the rating at 0 seconds from the rating at 10 seconds

Fatigue severity scale (FSS)3 months

The FSS includes 9 questions included in order to determine the negative effects of fatigue intensity and fatigue on daily life activities in the last week. İf the score more than 6.1, this is interpreted in favor of chronic fatigue syndrome.

Conditioned pain modulation3 months

For the assessment of conditioned pain modulation (CPM), first stimulus will be applied to trapezius with the pressure that induced a pain intensity of 4 point on a 10 point VAS. After that the right hand of the patient will be immersed in 7 degrees Celcius water for 20 seconds to create a conditioning stimulus. Second stimulus with the same intensity of first one was applied to trapezius after the conditioning stimulus and patients asked to rate their pain. The ratio between the first and second VAS values will be defined as CPM

Pressure pain threshold3 months

The spinal hyperalgesia will be evaluated from C3 and C7 (cervical); T6 and T2 (thoracic); L3 and L5 (lumbar) levels. The PPT assessments of these levels were performed over the spinous process and 2 cm right and left side of the corresponding spinous process. The sacroiliac PPT scores were obtained from four measurement points \[1\]. Trapezius muscle will be used to evaluate distant control point

Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (ASQoL)3 months

This scale was developed by Doward et.al in 2003 and consists of 18 questions in total. Each question is answered as yes or no, and the total score is calculated by evaluating the yes answer as 1 and no as 0. It is frequently used in clinical practice because it helps to evaluate the effects of the disease and determine treatment strategies in patients diagnosed with AxSpa.

Istanbul Low Back Pain Disability Index (ILBPDI)3 months

This scale was developed for assessing the severity of disability in chronic low back pain patients by Duruöz et.al in 2013. This scale consists of 18 questions in the form of a Likert scale that evaluates the limitation of daily life activities of patients in the last month.

VAS pain3 months

The patients pain severity will be evaluated with a 10-cm horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from "0 cm" (no discomfort) to "10 cm" (worst imaginable)

Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)3 months

BASDAI is one of the most frequently used scales for determining disease activity in axSpA patients and includes questions to evaluate the patient's axial and peripheral symptoms, fatigue and morning stiffness. The questionnaire consists of 10 questions in total and is interpreted in favor of disease activity of 4 points or more.

Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)3 months

This questionnaire consists of 21 questions, each with four options. Scoring is interpreted as 0-9 normal, 10-18 mild depression, 19-29 moderate depression and 30-63 points as severe depression.

Fibromyalgia Rapid Screening Tool3 months

This questionnaire is consisted of 6 questions in which fibromyalgia-related clinical parameters are investigated. The patient scoring at least 5 points is considered has fibromyalgia.

Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)3 months

This scale is designed for quantitative measurement of sleep quality and consists of 24 questions in total. The questions are divided into 7 sections those included sleep disturbance-related symptoms. High scores are associated with poor sleep quality.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Feyza Nur YUCEL

🇹🇷

Istanbul, Turkey

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath