MedPath

Comparison of Coronary Lithoplasty and Rotablation

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Coronary Artery Disease
Calcified Atheroma
Interventions
Procedure: Rotablation
Procedure: Coronary Lithoplasty
Registration Number
NCT04047368
Lead Sponsor
University of Giessen
Brief Summary

This study compares a new method of treating severely calcified coronary lesions, the intracoronary lithoplasty, with the current gold standard, the rotablation.

Detailed Description

Severe coronary calcification is still a challenge for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Reduction of the calcified plaque mass is necessary to achieve adequate stent expansion during further course. Rotablation has been the only reliable option to treat extremely calcified coronary lesions for a long time. Coronary lithoplasty has been recently introduced as a new promising treatment option in this special subset. It provides the unique opportunity to break severely calcified plaque structures even inside deeper layers of the vessel wall. Aim of this study is to compare rotablation and coronary lithotripsy for treatment of severely calcified coronary lesions. Plaque structure, plaque volume, as well as lumen diameters will be analyzed by optical coherence tomography (OCT) before and after debulking, as well as after stent implantation.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
70
Inclusion Criteria
  • Age>18 yrs
  • Stable coronary heart disease or acute coronary syndromes
  • Single or multi vessel disease. Vessel is defined as, left anterior descending, left circumflex, and right coronary arteries. Any branch within the vessel is considered part of the vessel.
  • Written informed consent was obtained before the procedure
  • Severely calcified coronary lesion with indication for rotablation
Exclusion Criteria
  • Known renal insufficiency (serum creatinine clearance <30ml/min/1.73m² or receiving dialysis)
  • Known allergy against protocol-required medications including ASS, prasugrel, ticagrelor, clopidogrel, heparin. History of bleeding diathesis or known coagulopathy
  • Cardiogenic shock
  • Lesion length > 32mm
  • Bifurcation lesions requiring 2-Stent-Strategies

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
RotablationRotablation-
Coronary LithoplastyCoronary Lithoplasty-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Minimal Stent Area (End of the Procedure)0 days
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Minimal/Mean/Maximal Lumen diameter0 days
Incidence of target vessel failure0 months; 1 month; 6 months
Incidence of target lesion failure0 months; 1 month; 6 months
MACE rate0 months; 1 month; 6 months
Minimal/Mean/Maximal Stent Diameter0 days
Minimal/Mean/Maximal Lumen area0 days
Mean/Maximal Stent area0 days

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University of Giessen

🇩🇪

Gießen, Germany

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath