To compare the effect of back school program vs swiss ball exercise on pain flexibility and disability among individuals with non specific back pain : A comparative study
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 入组人数
- 84
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- visual analog scale
研究概览
简要总结
NEED OF STUDY
Low back pain is a prevalent musculoskeletal condition globally considered a primary cause of years lived with disability It imposes a significant economic burden due to healthcare expenses reduced productivity, insurance costs, and sick leave. Non-specific low back pain is discomfort in the lower back without a clear identifiable cause and pathology.Back school programs typically involve education and exercises aimed at improving back health and function. On the other hand, Swiss ball exercises are one of the dynamic exercises, and the main principle is to reduce low back pain by increasing muscle strength, endurance, balance, and flexibility of the trunk while the individual leans on the Swiss ball. Both the intervention emphasizes on strength flexibility and core and core activation but back school program include knowledge and awareness through counselling as well as managing psychosocial aspect of pain so here arises a need to find out whether managing patient as a whole creates a difference in outcome or notIndividually, both the Back School Program and Swiss Ball Stabilization Exercise have shown promise in reducing pain, improving flexibility, and enhancing functional capacity among individuals with NSLBP but there is a notable absence of research exploring the combined effects of these interventions.However, a comparative assessment of these interventions is lacking in the current literature. Understanding the relative efficacy of these interventions is crucial for optimizing treatment outcomes and informing evidence-based practice in the management of NSLBP. The proposed comparative study aims to address this gap by directly comparing the effects of the Back School Program and Swiss Ball Stabilization Exercise on pain, flexibility, and disability among individuals with NSLBP. By conducting a rigorous comparative analysis, the study seeks to elucidate whether one intervention is superior to the other or if both exercises are equally effective.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18.00 Year(s) 至 35.00 Year(s)(—)
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Willingness of subjects 2) Patients diagnosed with non-specific low back pain 3)Patients with minimum to moderate disability up to 40% on MODI 4)Patients with VAS grade of 5 and below 5)Age group between 18- 35 years 6)Both Male and Female.
排除标准
- •Spinal tumour or other malignancy.
- •Lumbar stenosis spondylitis, spondylolisthesis, 4)Neuromuscular disease of back 5)Presence of any lumbar Spinal or disc pathologies.
- •Presence of any Recent injury or Trauma.
- •Cauda equina syndrome that requires urgent surgery.
- •pregnant patients 9)joint disfunction.
结局指标
主要结局
visual analog scale
时间窗: 4 days in a week for 4 weeks.
次要结局
- Modified oswestry low back pain disability sacle(1 day , last day in 4 weeks)
研究者
Nandini Yadav
Parul institute of physiotherapy
