Neuromodulation for Dysphoria
- Conditions
- Dysphoria
- Interventions
- Device: Guided Meditation VR for Wellness
- Registration Number
- NCT05061745
- Lead Sponsor
- Florida State University
- Brief Summary
This is an open label prospective pilot study of two neuromodulation interventions for patients suffering from dysphoria. Dysphoria is a transdiagnostic symptom of unease or dissatisfaction experienced across a range of diagnoses, including mood disorders and pain. There is a significant gap of treatment options across conditions with dysphoria, particularly non-medicated and self-care alternatives.
Many neuromodulation therapies require extensive medical resources or time to deliver. Thus, the investigators will test two non-invasive technologies administered in a manner that would reduce resources and/or time. Virtual Reality (VR) overlays the sensory system to block the external environment and provide vast range of meaningful sensory experiences. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) involves a magnetic pulse passing through the scalp to depolarize neurons in the outer cortex of the brain, and daily treatments over 6 weeks are currently FDA indicated for the treatment of major depressive disorder. Accelerated TMS is the delivery of treatment in a shorter period of time.
The primary objective of this study to demonstrate the preliminary effectiveness, tolerability, and feasibility of these two interventions: Guided Meditation VR for Wellness and Accelerated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 100
Not provided
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SEQUENTIAL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Guided Meditation VR for Wellness Guided Meditation VR for Wellness Selected modules of commercially available meditation VR
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Arm 1 Hypothesis 2 Week 2 Primary Outcome measure is SF-36 Short Form for all patients.
Arm 1 Hypothesis 1 Week 2 Primary Outcome will be determined by descriptive feasibility metrics. Feasibility will be determined by number of patients enrolled.
Arm 1 Hypothesis 4 From Baseline over 10 weeks Primary Outcome measure is the clinician-administered scale that tracks the designated primary disorder.
Arm 3 Hypothesis 5 Treatment B - Week 2 Primary Outcome measure is the SF-36 Short Form for all participants. Significantly greater improvement in rating scores from baseline of Treatment A Exit Visit ("Follow Up A1" or "Follow Up A5") to "Follow Up B1" will be tested (t-test).
Arm 1 Hypothesis 3 Week 2 Primary Outcome measure is the clinician-administered scale that tracks the designated primary disorder.
Arm 2 Hypothesis 1 Week 2 Primary Outcome measure is the SF-36 Short Form for all participants.
Arm 2 Hypothesis 2 Week 2 Primary Outcome measure is the clinician-administered scale that tracks the designated primary disorder.
Arm 2-3 Hypothesis 3 From Baseline to Week 6 Primary Outcome measure is SF-36 Short Form for all participants.
Arm 2-3 Hypothesis 4 Week 2 Primary outcome (Treatments A and B). Tolerability will be assessed by side effect profile.
Arm 2-3 Hypothesis 4-Treatment B Treatment B-Week 6 Primary outcome (Treatments A and B). Tolerability will be assessed by side effect profile.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Florida State University
🇺🇸Tallahassee, Florida, United States