EICU Analgesia and Sedation Cross-sectional Survey
- Conditions
- Sedation and AnalgesiaICU
- Interventions
- Other: No Intervention
- Registration Number
- NCT04674540
- Lead Sponsor
- Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
- Brief Summary
Sedation and analgesia is a very important part of the comprehensive treatment of critically ill patients. The comprehensive management strategy of sedation and analgesia in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and the control of infection, the application of antibiotics, and active recovery-are equally important. Effective sedation and analgesia assessment tools and reasonable comprehensive management strategies can not only improve patient comfort, reduce discomfort memory, but also reduce nursing workload and improve clinical outcomes. The "eCASH" theory proposed by Vincent et al. in 2016 further improved the comprehensive management strategy for sedation and analgesia. Its main contents are early analgesia to make patients comfortable, minimal sedatives and maximum humanitarian care. However, unreasonable sedation, especially early deep sedation, is closely related to the poor prognosis of patients. With the update of the ICU sedation and analgesia guidelines and the continuous progress of related research, ICU doctors have gradually deepened their understanding of sedation and analgesia. At present, the level of emergency ICU development in various regions of the country is uneven, and the implementation of sedation and analgesia may also vary greatly. Therefore, by investigating and understanding the implementation of emergency ICU or ICU sedation and analgesia in various regions of the country, you can indirectly understand the familiarity of medical staff with sedation and analgesia guidelines, and formulate corresponding strategies for specific situations, which may help improve critical illness. The level of sedation and analgesia of the patient improves the treatment effect.
So far, there are few domestic research reports on the implementation of sedation and analgesia in critical patients, especially the data in the emergency ICU. This study intends to investigate the implementation status of sedation and analgesia in critically ill patients in ICU, to understand the familiarity of medical staff with sedation and analgesia guidelines, and provide a basis for further measures.
- Detailed Description
Part 1: Cognitive survey
Participants: emergency and critical illness medical staff (doctors and nurses) of participating units. The number of medical staff in each unit is at least 12, among which doctors and nurses are ≥6 (the ratio is ≥3 for elementary level and ≥3 for intermediate and above).
Investigate awareness of sedation and analgesia guidelines.
Part 2: Current status of sedation and analgesia
Participants: patients older than 18 years old in the ICU of the participating unit.
1. Collect general information of patients that meet the inclusion criteria, including the patient's gender, age, body mass index (BMI), length of stay in ICU (days, with 1 effective decimal), diagnosis, acute physiology and chronicity on day 1 Health status score (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, APACHE II), whether to receive mechanical ventilation, whether to use vasoconstrictor to maintain blood pressure and other information;
2. Assess whether the patients need sedation and analgesia, and divide the patients into groups.
1. Sedation assessment: Use the Richmond Sedation and Restlessness Score (RASS score) for sedation assessment. For mechanically ventilated patients, if the RASS score is ≥1, sedation is considered necessary; for patients without mechanical ventilation, if the RASS score is ≥2, consider Sedation is needed; for patients who have been given sedation and the RASS score reaches the target, sedation is also considered necessary.
2. Analgesia evaluation: The digital pain scoring method is used for awake patients, and when the score is ≥4 points, the drug is administered according to the WHO three-step analgesic principle; non-conscious patients should use the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT), If CPOT ≥ 3 points, it is considered that there is pain, and analgesia is needed; for patients who are already on analgesia treatment and the pain score reaches the standard, it is also considered that analgesia is needed.
3. Evaluation of delirium: Has delirium occurred after entering the ICU? Do you use delirium assessment tools? Record the means of delirium management;
3. If sedation and analgesia is required, relevant information will be collected according to the actual situation of each research unit. For patients who do not require sedation and analgesia after the second step assessment, there is no need to collect sedation and analgesia information. This information includes:
1. Is there any sedation and analgesia?
2. Information about sedation: Are sedation assessment tools used (if used, what kind of sedation assessment tools are used); are sedation target values set (record specific values)? Actual sedation score; name and dose of sedative drugs;
3. Analgesia-related information: whether to use analgesia evaluation tools (if used, what analgesia evaluation tools are recorded); whether to set an analgesia target value (record the specific value)? Actual analgesic score; name and dosage of analgesic drugs;
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 1195
- Multiple intensive care units (ICU) and emergency intensive care units (EICU) in China
- Patients older than 18 years in the ICU/EICU
- None
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Sedation and Analgesia Implementation Status Group No Intervention To investigate the implementation status of sedation and analgesia in ICU critical patients.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Cognition of Sedation and Analgesia 1 day Awareness of sedation and analgesia guidelines. The questionnaire involves 20 questions about the main principles and knowledge of ICU sedation and analgesia treatment.
Analgesia evaluation: The digital pain scoring method 1 day Analgesia evaluation: The digital pain scoring method is used for awake patients (score from 0 to 10);
Analgesia evaluation: Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool 1 day Analgesia evaluation: non-conscious patients should use the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT, score from 0 to 8).
Sedation assessment: Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale 1 day Sedation assessment: Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (RASS, score from -5 to 4) for sedation assessment.
Analgesia evaluation-Confusion Assessment Method of the Intensive Care Unit 1 day Evaluation of delirium: Confusion Assessment Method of the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) for delirium evaluation.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method General information of patients-APACHE II 1 day Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II)
General information of patients-gender 1 day gender (male or female)
General information of patients-age 1 day Age (older than 18 years )
General information of patients-BMI 1 day height(kg), weight(cm); weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m\^2).
General information of patients-length of stay in ICU 1 day length of stay in ICU (day)
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine & Institute of Emergency Medicine, Zhejiang University
🇨🇳Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China