MedPath

KRONOS Versus Breg T-Scope Post-operative Knee Braces Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction

Not Applicable
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction Surgery
Registration Number
NCT07090616
Lead Sponsor
Rush University Medical Center
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate how well the KRONOS postoperative knee brace reduces pain and enhances recovery compared with the standard Breg T-scope hinged brace following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction knee surgery.

Detailed Description

The KRONOS postoperative unloader brace features a new bracing technology that combines the capability of hyperextension immobilization with additional benefits of offloading up to 60 lbs off the knee joint. The adjustable tensioning system in the KRONOS brace offers promising potential to significantly alleviate patient discomfort and pain, facilitate quicker return to a higher level of activity, and ultimately contribute to improved surgical outcomes.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
40
Inclusion Criteria
  • Subjects > 18 years of age
  • English-speaking
  • Scheduled to undergo primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery
  • No history of prior knee surgery on the operative knee
  • No concomitant ligamentous repair or reconstruction procedures (i.e. ligamentous pathology aside from anterior cruciate ligament).
  • Subjects undergoing concurrent partial meniscectomy or meniscus repair that would not alter postoperative weight-bearing status or rehabilitation protocol would be eligible for inclusion.
  • Clinical and radiographic examination (MRI) consistent with an acute full thickness ACL tear
Exclusion Criteria
  • Age < 18 years of age
  • Non-English speaking
  • Revision ACL reconstruction
  • Multi-ligamentous injury, including concomitant posterior cruciate ligament, medial collateral ligament and fibular collateral ligament injuries
  • Concomitant meniscal or cartilage injury that would alter postoperative weight bearing status or rehabilitation protocol
  • Inability to comply with the proposed follow-up clinic visits
  • Subjects lacking decisional capacity
  • Worker's compensation subjects
  • Requiring a custom-sized brace

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Rates of extension deficit1 year post-operative

Rates of extension deficit (as measured by the fraction of patients with reduced extension compared to the contralateral determined by heel height and goniometric measurements of knee extension (cm/ degrees)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Rush University Medical Center

🇺🇸

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Rush University Medical Center
🇺🇸Chicago, Illinois, United States
Jonathan Gustafson, PhD
Sub Investigator
Jorge Chahla, MD PhD
Principal Investigator
Adam Yanke, MD PhD
Sub Investigator

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.