The Effect of Self-Compassion Interventions on Nursing Students' Stress, Resilience, and Psychological Well-Being
- Conditions
- To Determine the Impact of Self-compassion Intervention
- Registration Number
- NCT06754683
- Lead Sponsor
- Near East University, Turkey
- Brief Summary
The study aims to determine the impact of self-compassion-based psycho-education on supporting nursing students in managing stress, improving their resilience, and enhancing their self-compassion and psychological well-being. Self-compassion involves being kind to self during challenging times; it provides practical tools and knowledge to enhance personal growth and resilience. By participating in this program, nursing students may learn strategies to improve their coping with the pressure of studies, build emotional strength, and improve their psychological well-being. The study will measure the participants' levels of self-compassion, stress, resilience, and psychological well-being using a validated questionnaire before and after participation in the program and compare them to determine the program's impact on the abovementioned variables.
- Detailed Description
The below standard operating procedures will be used to make sure that the study's patient recruitment, data collection, data management, data analysis, and reporting of adverse events are all done consistently, accurately in line with ethical standards: The inclusion and exclusion criteria, which specify the eligibility criteria, will guide the recruitment of participants. The recruitment process will use a variety of student communication channels, such as emails, social media, and classroom announcements, to invite participants to the study. The investigators will provide study details to the participants before obtaining informed consent; demographic information about the participants and their recruitment status will be kept in secure folders. The investigators will use validated instruments before and after the intervention to measure self-compassion, stress, resilience, and psychological well-being, as approved by the ethics committee and data quality control procedures. The self-compassion-based psychoeducation will be delivered according to the protocol approved by the ethics committee. Participants' identities will be confidential and kept in secure password-protected systems for storing data; the investigators will conduct regular audits during data entry to ensure consistency and accuracy. Statistical package software for social sciences, version 25, will be used for analysis as planned in collaboration with a statistical analysis expert to ensure accurate interpretation of the results. The participants will be given information and contact the investigators to report adverse events, such as any unexpected psychological distress during or after the program. The research team will document, follow up with the participants, and refer them to the university counseling center if necessary.
Based on the effect size of a previous related study, the magnitude of self-compassion was calculated as large (f: 0.65). The assumption that the effect size would be large (f=0.40) in the study was that the sample size required for 95% (1-β=0.95) power at the α=0.05 level was calculated as 64 participants, 32 from each group, using G\*Power 3.1.9.2 software. F tests - ANOVA: Repeated measures, between factors Analysis: A priori: Compute required sample size Input: Effect size f = 0.4, α err prob = 0.05, Power (1-β err prob) = 0.95, Number of groups = 2 Number of measurements = 2 Corr among rep measures = 0.5 Output: noncentrality parameter λ = 13.6533333, Critical F = 3.9958871, Numerator df = 1 .0000000 Denominator df = 62.0000000, Total sample size = 64, actual power = 0.9532541. Subjects will be recruited through convenience sampling.
To ensure the integrity and validity of results, the investigators will use validated data collection tools, conduct periodic checks during data collection, and maintain regular communication and simple explanations to participants to encourage complete and accurate responses. Investigators will regularly check the collected data for completeness and the data entries for further review and possibly record the type and extent of missing data in a log for transparency. Depending on the type of data missing, the investigators will handle it appropriately through coding, imputation technique, or exclusion criteria; the investigators will assess the pattern of the missing data and undertake sensitivity analysis in order to examine the impact of missing data on results and validate conclusion, the investigators will report all the above if it occurs to ensure transparency in handling missing data without altering participants' response.
Evaluation of Data: All data will be analyzed using the study's Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25. Descriptive statistics (frequencies, percentage, mean, and standard deviation) will be used to describe the demographic data and the summary of the scores of SSCS-L, stress, resilience, and PWB. For the impact of the intervention, a normality test will be conducted using the Kolmogorov- Smirnov test, and an appropriate statistical test will be applied after the test; for instance, an independent t-test will be utilized for between-group comparisons if the test satisfies the assumptions of parametric independent t-tests) If the assumption is not met, the alternative nonparametric test (Mann-Whitney U Test) will be used. For within-group comparisons, if the data satisfy the assumption of the parametric test, paired t-tests will be applied to assess changes in the intervention group between the pre-test and post-test, as well as that of the control group. The significance level will be set at p\<0.05; if the assumption of the parametric test (Paired t-tests) is not met, a nonparametric alternative (Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test) will be used, and the significance level will be set at p\<0.05.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- NOT_YET_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 64
- International students of Nursing Faculty
- The participants should be able to communicate effectively using the English language.
- Participants did not participate in self-compassion -based training before
- The subject has commenced clinical posting and experience.
- Participants with low self-compassion score in the preliminary survey
- Participants receiving psychotherapy
- Participants who are currently enrolled in any online or face-to-face stress management training or course.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in self-compassion score as measured by state self-compassion scale (SSCS) Baseline, 8 Weeks Self-compassion score as measured by the state self-compassion scale, is a 5 rating scale with 1= not at all true for me to 5= Very true for me with a total of 18 items that can assess total (composite) self-compassion score as well as the six (kindness, self-judgment, mindfulness, over-identification, common humanity and isolation) individual elements of self-compassion. To compute a total state self-compassion score: the investigators will take the mean of each subscale, to compute a total mean (the average of the six subscale means as suggested by the scale authors). The score cut-off point is 1.0-2.49 to be low, 2.5-3.5 to moderate, and 3.51-5.0 to be high. When examining subscale scores, higher scores on the self-judgment, isolation, and over-identification scale indicate less self-compassion before reverse-coding, and more self-compassion after reverse coding.
Psychological well-being score as measured by brief inventory of thriving scale (BITS) Baseline, 8 Weeks Psychological well-being score as measured by brief inventory of thriving scale, it is a 5 Likert rating scale with 1= totally disagree to 5= totally agree with a total of 10 items. The scores cut off point is 1.0-2.49 to be low, between 2.5-3.5 to be moderate, and 3.51-5.0 to be high.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in stress score as measured by student nurse stress index scale (SNSI) Baseline, 8 Weeks Stress as measured by student nurse stress index scale, it is a 5 Likert rating scale with 1= Not stressful to 5= Extremely stressful with a total of 22 items. The SNSI is scored on a continuum, from not stressful (22) to extremely stressful (110)
Change in resilience score as measured by measured by Connor-Davidson resilience sacle (CD-RISC-10 scale). Baseline, 8 Weeks Resilience as measured by CD-RISC-10 scale, it is a 5 rating scale with 0= not true at all to 4= true nearly all the time, with a total of 10 items. The total of the rating will give a composite score that ranges from 0 to 40. Higher score rating will represent greater resilience while lower score will indicate low resilience.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Near East University, Turkey
🇹🇷Yakin Dogu Boulverd, Mersin Turkey, Turkey