跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07548866
NCT07548866进行中(未招募)不适用

COMPARISON OF LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY AND TRACHEAL INTUBATION WITH AND WITHOUT TOPICAL LIDOCAINE APPLICATION

St. Petersburg State Pavlov Medical University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 150 人开始时间: 2026年4月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
进行中(未招募)
发起方
入组人数
150
试验地点
1
主要终点
Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS), Ramsay, cough severity and frequencies over a 5-min observation period

研究概览

简要总结

The study aims to identify the advantages and disadvantages of each of the three methods of airway management during FESS.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Case Control
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • general anesthesia during fess

排除标准

  • history of mental and neurological diseases

研究组 & 干预措施

LMA (1)

the laryngeal mask was installed intraoperatively

干预措施: laryngeal mask placement (Device)

TI (2)

tracheal intubation was performed intraoperatively

干预措施: tracheal intubation (Device)

TIL (3)

intraoperative tracheal intubation and respiratory tract anesthesia were performed

干预措施: anesthesia of the respiratory tract with lidocaine (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS), Ramsay, cough severity and frequencies over a 5-min observation period

时间窗: the first 15 minutes after waking up

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
St. Petersburg State Pavlov Medical University
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Vladimir Pavlov

MD, Assistant professor

St. Petersburg State Pavlov Medical University

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验