跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2025/03/082761
CTRI/2025/03/082761尚未招募不适用

Comparative study of newer mask ventilation Technique(thumb sealing and angle of mandible technique- tsam) with conventional thenar eminence Technique of mask ventilation during induction of General anesthesia - A randomized cross over study.

Institue of medical science and sum hospital1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 120 人开始时间: 2025年3月28日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
发起方
入组人数
120
试验地点
1
主要终点
Compare efficacy of

研究概览

简要总结

Mask ventilation is one of the necessary abilities required for successful airway management.

Maintenance of airway patency and oxygenation are major goals of mask ventilation. Difficult mask ventilation could happen in four out of 1000 patients. When the conventional mask ventilation is difficult, several alternative techniques have been described. One such technique is conventional thenar eminence. In this technique downward pressure is applied with thenar eminences of both hands while four fingers of each hand pull the jaw towards the mask, it leads to closure of mouth resulting in airway obstruction at the oropharynx. However, this obstruction could possibly be overcome by the use of an appropriately sized oro-pharyngeal airway.

This may not be successful in all patients. In newer mask ventilation technique four finger of both hands used at angle of mandible to provide upward pressure that lift the mandible relieve tongue fall and both thumbs provide downward and forward pressure nasal part of mask providing better seal. We hypothesized that this proposed newer mask ventilation technique would result in increased ventilation in terms of expired tidal volume.

This randomized crossover study designed to evaluate efficacy of newer mask ventilation technique against conventional thenar eminence mask ventilation technique.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18.00 Year(s) 至 60.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • Adults between 18 and 60 years of age of either sex undergoing general anesthesia and belonging to ASA class 1 or 2.

排除标准

  • Patients belonging ASA class 3, 4, 5 Surgery on neck and oral cavity Patients with maxillomandibular deformities Patients with full stomach Patients with known gastro-esophageal disorders Emergency surgeries.

结局指标

主要结局

Compare efficacy of

时间窗: at baseline after first minute and after third minute

newer mask ventilation technique in

时间窗: at baseline after first minute and after third minute

improving expired tidal volume over

时间窗: at baseline after first minute and after third minute

conventional thenar eminence mask

时间窗: at baseline after first minute and after third minute

ventilation technique.

时间窗: at baseline after first minute and after third minute

次要结局

  • To compare the peak(airway pressure( P MAX) and ease of mask)

研究者

发起方
Institue of medical science and sum hospital
申办方类型
Private medical college
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Meghana Lavu

IMS and SUM hospital

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验