跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02683460
NCT02683460Unknown不适用

Comparison of Clinical Results of Patella Resurfacing Versus Patellar Retention Under Subvastus Approach in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Trial

The Catholic University of Korea0 个研究点目标入组 100 人开始时间: 2016年2月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
100
主要终点
Knee Society score

研究概览

简要总结

This study aims to compare the clinical results of patella resurfacing or not under subvastus approach in total knee arthroplasty. Even though the excellent results of total knee arthroplasty(TKA), there is persistent controversy over whether or not to replace the patella. Anterior knee pain continued to be a unsolved problem of TKA patients. Some surgeons always performed patella resurfacing during total knee arthroplasty but the others didn't do that. It's up to surgeon's preference. There were several studies of patellar resurfacing or not in TKA. But previous studies almost have been done under other approach, not a subvastus approach.

This study prospectively randomized patients receiving bilateral TKA with patellar resurfacing or not in each knee. Patients preference and clinical results was investigated in both knee of same patients who received patellar resurfacing or not during minimum 2 year follow up.

详细描述

The primary objective of this work was to compare pain, stiffness and function between groups at minimum 2 year postoperatively. Secondarily, we compared pain, patient preference at minimum 2 year postoperatively. The investigators hypothesized that there would be no difference between the two groups of subjects in the measured outcomes.

Patients receiving TKA were prospectively enrolled before surgery and randomized intraoperatively to either receive patella replacement or not in both knee of same patients. Subjects were assessed pre-operatively and at 6 months, 1, 2 years postoperatively for pain, function, and stiffness using a disease-specific (Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index [WOMAC]) . Other measurements like Knee Society score, Feller's score, Patient satisfaction (VAS) also checked pre-operatively and at 6 months, 1, 2 years postoperatively.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
19 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients for total knee arthroplasty
  • Having medicare insurance

排除标准

  • Patients who are not able to cooperate
  • Serious deformity (not suitable for a standard TKA prosthesis)
  • Patellar thickness less than 18 mm
  • Prior operation involving the extensor mechanism
  • Rheumatoid arthritis
  • Severe medical disability limiting the ability to walk
  • Revision surgery
  • Knees with predominantly patellofemoral arthrosis

结局指标

主要结局

Knee Society score

时间窗: Change from preoperative score to postoperative 2 years

WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster University Arthritis Index) pain scale

时间窗: Change from preoperative score to postoperative 2 years

次要结局

  • Feller's score(Change from preoperative score to postoperative 2 years)
  • Patients satisfaction using Visual Analog Score for pain(Change from preoperative score to postoperative 2 years)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Yong In

Professor

The Catholic University of Korea

相似试验