comparission between inhalational and intravenous anaesthetic agent for insertion of supraglottic airways in childre
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: - Health Condition 2: O- Medical and SurgicalHealth Condition 3: O- Medical and Surgical
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2021/10/037488
- Lead Sponsor
- Adesh Institute of Medical Sciences and Reaesrch
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
1.Patient with both sexes with age between 4-12 years
2. ASA I and II physical status.
3. Patient undergoing elective minor surgical procedures below umbilicus lasting less than60 minutes.
4. No anticipated difficult airway (Mallampati Grade I or II)
Exclusion Criteria
1. Patients at risk of aspiration â?? upper GI surgery, gastroesophageal disease, not fasted.
2. Patients with oropharyngeal pathology
3. Patients who require high positive pressure ventilation â?? eg. Pulmonary fibrosis.
4. Patients with cardiovascular, pulmonary and renal disease
5. Hypersensitivity to halogenated anaesthetic agents or propofol.
6. ASA III and IV physical status
7. Difficult airway (Mallampati Grade III or IV)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the efficacy and safety of anaesthesia induction agent sevoflurane versus propofol for insertion of I-gel in paediatric patients undergoing elective surgical procedures under general anaesthesia.Timepoint: TIME TO INDUCTION- <br/ ><br>(Time taken from the administration of induction agent i.e. zero seconds to loss of consciousness and loss of eyelash reflex) <br/ ><br> <br/ ><br> TIME TO JAW RELAXATION â?? <br/ ><br>( Time taken from the administration of induction agent i.e. zero seconds to relaxation of jaw required to open the mouth) <br/ ><br> <br/ ><br> TIME TO I-GEL INSERTION - <br/ ><br>(Time taken from the administration of induction agent i.e. zero seconds to successful insertion of I-gel) <br/ ><br>
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method We will compare the time for induction, time for jaw relaxation and time for I-gel insertion between the two groups. <br/ ><br>We will compare complications during induction and insertion of I- gel between the two groups. <br/ ><br>We will compare hemodynamic parameters of the two groups <br/ ><br>We will also compare recovery profile of the two groups. <br/ ><br>Timepoint: TIME TO INDUCTION- <br/ ><br>(Time taken from the administration of induction agent i.e. zero second to loss of consciousness and loss of eyelash reflex) <br/ ><br> <br/ ><br> TIME TO JAW RELAXATION â?? <br/ ><br>( Time taken from the administration of induction agent i.e. zero second to relaxation of jaw required to open the mouth) <br/ ><br> <br/ ><br> TIME TO I-GEL INSERTION - <br/ ><br>(Time taken from the administration of induction agent i.e. zero second to successful insertion of I-gel) <br/ ><br>