MedPath

Testing the Efficacy of REThink Main Game-based ER Strategies on the Stress Reactivity

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Emotion Regulation
Interventions
Other: REThink Game
Registration Number
NCT05257642
Lead Sponsor
Babes-Bolyai University
Brief Summary

This activity will aim to test the comparative efficacy of the main game-based emotion-regulation abilities training of the REThink online game: cognitive change, biofeedback and problem-solving in reducing stress reactivity of the children and adolescents

Detailed Description

Children included in this study (aged 8-16 years, G\*Power estimated N=98) will be allocated to one of the three experimental conditions (cognitive change, biofeedback and problem-solving game based training based on the REThink online game levels), or no intervention Control condition. All children will be exposed afterwards to psychosocial stress in the form of peer rejection "ball toss" task. It will be measure both game-based skills outcomes, and EMA stress reactivity outcomes.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
146
Inclusion Criteria

children and adolescents between 8 and 16 years provided written parental consent

Exclusion Criteria

Intellectual disability or physical limitations precluded the use of the computer program

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Cognitive Change GroupsREThink GameThe participants in this group will complete the pre-test measurements, then they will receive a level of the REThink Game that focuses on cognitive change. After playing the game they will receive an experimental task Cyberball and complete the post-test measurements.
Mindfulness GroupsREThink GameThe participants in this group will complete the pre-test measurements, then they will receive a level of the REThink Game that focuses on mindfulness and relaxation. After playing the game they will receive an experimental task Cyberball and complete the post-test measurements
Positive bias GroupREThink GameThe participants in this group will complete the pre-test measurements, then they will receive a level of the REThink Game that focuses on problem-solving. After playing the game they will receive an experimental task Cyberball and complete the post-test measurements
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Levels of rational and irrational beliefsPre-intervention (one week before the intervention)

The Child and Adolescent Scale of Irrationality (CASI, Bernard \& Cronan, 1999) will be used in order to test irrational/rational beliefs as a mechanism of change. Children and adolescents were asked to express their agreement/disagreement with the 28 statements on a 5-point Likert-type scale, from 1 ("strong disagreement") to 5 ("strong agreement")

Changes in rational and irrational beliefsPost-intervention (one week afterthe intervention)

The Child and Adolescent Scale of Irrationality (CASI, Bernard \& Cronan, 1999) will be used in order to test irrational/rational beliefs as a mechanism of change. Children and adolescents were asked to express their agreement/disagreement with the 28 statements on a 5-point Likert-type scale, from 1 ("strong disagreement") to 5 ("strong agreement")

Levels of emotion-regulationPre-intervention (one week before the intervention)

The Emotion Regulation Index for Children and Adolescents (ERICA; Biesecker \& Easterbrooks, 2001). It is a 13-item on a five-point Likert scale, from 0 "strong disagreement" to 5"strong agreement" where higher scores represent better emotional regulation abilities,

Levels of mindfulnessPre-intervention (one week before the intervention)

The Mindfulness Awarness Attention Scale - Child version (MAAS-C, Lawlor, Reichl \& Zumbo, 2014) is a 15-items questionnaire rated on a 6 points Likert scale from "almost never" to "almost every time" where higher scores means higher mindfulness.

Changes in levels of mindfulnessPost-intervention (one week afterthe intervention)

The Mindfulness Awarness Attention Scale - Child version (MAAS-C, Lawlor, Reichl \& Zumbo, 2014) is a 15-items questionnaire rated on a 6 points Likert scale from "almost never" to "almost every time" where higher scores means higher mindfulness.

Levels of well-beingPre-intervention (one week before the intervention)

WHO-5 Well-being Index

Changes in levels of well-beingPost-intervention (one week afterthe intervention)

WHO-5 Well-being Index

Changes in levels of emotion-regulationPost-intervention (one week afterthe intervention)

The Emotion Regulation Index for Children and Adolescents (ERICA; Biesecker \& Easterbrooks, 2001). It is a 13-item on a five-point Likert scale, from 0 "strong disagreement" to 5"strong agreement" where higher scores represent better emotional regulation abilities,

Level of distressPre-intervention (one week before the intervention)

Measured with Profile of Emotional Distress

Changes in level of distressPost-intervention (one week afterthe intervention)

Measured with Profile of Emotional Distress

Children Emotional AbilitiesPre-intervention (one week before the intervention)

The Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire - Short (Garnefski \& Kraaij, 2006) is an 18-item self-report scale that measures a total of nine different cognitive coping strategies, each addressed by two items.

Changes in children Emotional AbilitiesPost-intervention (one week afterthe intervention)

The Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire - Short (Garnefski \& Kraaij, 2006) is an 18-item self-report scale that measures a total of nine different cognitive coping strategies, each addressed by two items.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Babes-Bolyai University

🇷🇴

Cluj-Napoca, Romania

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath