MedPath

comparison of two methods for insertion of tube in the windpipe

Not Applicable
Conditions
Health Condition 1: null- Children who are scheduled for eye surgery
Registration Number
CTRI/2015/01/005428
Lead Sponsor
RP Centre All India institute of medical sciences
Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
Open to Recruitment
Sex
Not specified
Target Recruitment
60
Inclusion Criteria

3-15 kgs children

Normal airway

Scheduled for surgery under general anaesthesia requiring endotracheal intubation

Exclusion Criteria

•Children with congenital anomaly

•Children with difficult airway.

•Children with heart disease

•Children with reactive airway disease

•Children with metabolic disease

•Children weighing less than 3 kg or more than 15 kg

Study & Design

Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
1.To compare the straight blade C-Mac videolaryngoscope with or without use of stylet for ease of endotracheal intubation in the pediatric patients in terms of intubation conditions and the time to intubationTimepoint: From the time laryngoscope blade touches the lip till confirmation of intubation with CO2 trace on the monitor
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
2.To compare the hemodynamic stability with two techniques for endotracheal intubationTimepoint: From the time laryngoscope blade touches the lip till confirmation of intubation with CO2 trace on the monitor
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath