跳至主要内容
临床试验/NL-OMON38501
NL-OMON38501已完成不适用

Advantages of a flexible wrist unit compared to a static wrist unit in people using an arm prosthesis. - Advantages of flexible wrist units in arm prostheses.

niversitair Medisch Centrum Groningen0 个研究点目标入组 16 人开始时间: 待定最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
16

研究概览

简要总结

暂无简介。

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional

入排标准

年龄范围
18 至 99(—)

入选标准

  • -Having at least one year experience with using a myo-electrical lower arm prosthesis with a passive wrist unit. People using an active, static wrist unit can join the project when not enough participants can be found who use a passive wrist unit.
  • -Wearing the prosthesis for at least four hours a day.
  • -The prosthetic hand has got one degree of freedom (opening and closing the hand).
  • -Able to undergo tests and to fill out questionnaires.
  • Participants only participate after providing written informed consent. ;Healthy participants:
  • - Matching one participant (prosthetic user) for hand dominance (prosthetic user*s dominant hand is concerned as the non-amputated hand), age, gender, length and weight.

排除标准

  • Prosthetic users:
  • -Co morbidities that could influence the results of the study (for example, neurological disorders or rheumatic diseases that can influence arm function).
  • -Having experience with a Flex-wrist or Multi-flex wrist. ;Healthy subjects:
  • - Having any complaints of the musculoskeletal system.

研究者

相似试验