Implementation of the ASCEND Training for Supervisors in Dutch Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs)
- Conditions
- Occupational HealthStressBurnoutMental Health ConditionsSickness Absence
- Registration Number
- NCT06989398
- Lead Sponsor
- VU University of Amsterdam
- Brief Summary
This cluster randomized controlled trial (cRCT) aims to evaluate the effectiveness of an in-person group intervention for workplace supervisors - Advancing Supervisors' Capacity for Mental Health at Work (ASCEND) - in Dutch Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs). The ASCEND intervention is designed to equip supervisors with the skills to: i) know when to support their workers; ii) how to direct workers to support, and iii) advocate for action on mental health at work.
The primary objectives of this project are to:
* Assess to what extent the novel, WHO-developed ASCEND intervention is effective in enhancing supervisors' confidence, responsiveness, mental health literacy, and SelfCare practices, and in reducing supervisor stigma towards mental health conditions within Dutch SMEs.
* Evaluate the impact of the ASCEND intervention on employee outcomes, including mental health and work-related outcomes among supervisees (i.e., subordinates), as well as overall organizational absenteeism rates.
* Identify barriers, facilitators, and key implementation and adoption indicators to support future opportunities for scaling up the ASCEND intervention in the context of Dutch SMEs.
Researchers will compare two groups to evaluate the effectiveness of the ASCEND intervention. One group will receive the training (the intervention group), while the other group will receive the training after the final follow-up period (the control group).
Data will be collected from both supervisors and their supervisees (i.e., subordinates) via online questionnaires at various time points. In addition, general organizational information, including absenteeism rates, will be gathered through a representative from each participating organization.
To further explore the feasibility of scaling up the ASCEND intervention within the Netherlands, qualitative data will be collected through interviews and/or focus group discussions.
- Detailed Description
Small and Medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) often lack the resources to effectively address the negative consequences of work-related stressors (e.g., high workplace digitalization). Moreover, supervisors play a pivotal role in protecting employee well-being, yet they frequently report feeling poorly equipped to recognize and support employees experiencing mental health problems.
This project aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Advancing Supervisors' Capacity for Mental Health at Work (ASCEND), an in-person group intervention developed by the World Health Organization (WHO). The ASCEND intervention is designed to equip supervisors with the skills to: i) know when to support their workers; ii) how to direct workers to support, and iii) advocate for action on mental health at work.
The first phase of this study concerns a cluster randomized controlled trial (cRCT) comparing ASCEND and waitlist, where supervisors in the control group receive the intervention approx. 6 months after baseline. The second phase consists in the qualitative process evaluation that pertains individual interviews and/or focus group discussions.
In the first study phase, data will be collected through online questionnaires administered to supervisors and their supervisees (i.e., subordinates). Additionally, general organizational information, including absenteeism rates, will be gathered from a designated representative within each organization. Supervisors in the intervention group will complete surveys at baseline, immediately post-intervention, and at 1-month and 3-month follow-ups. Supervisors in the control group, as well as supervisees, will complete surveys at baseline, 1-month follow-up, and 3-month follow-up.
The primary outcome is supervisor confidence in supporting employees with mental health conditions at the 1-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes include supervisor responsiveness, stigma toward mental health conditions, mental health literacy, and SelfCare practices. Supervisees will be invited to provide exploratory outcome data on perceived supervisor responsiveness, perceived StaffCare, psychological distress, help-seeking intentions, work stress, absenteeism, and presenteeism. Additionally, general absenteeism figures for the participating SMEs will be collected.
The study aims to recruit 74 SMEs, randomly allocated to either the ASCEND intervention group (n = 37) or the waitlist control group (n = 37). Each SME is expected to enrol at least two supervisors, resulting in a total sample of 148 managers for this study phase. Sample size calculations indicate that a minimum of 60 SMEs is required to detect a significant increase in supervisor confidence at 1-month follow-up with an effect size of Cohen's d = 0.59, accounting for 20% attrition (power = 0.80, two-sided alpha = 0.05, ICC = 0.01).
In the second study phase, a process evaluation will be conducted to assess factors such as intervention acceptability, appropriateness, barriers, and facilitators to implementation. Qualitative data will be gathered through post-intervention online surveys and interviews with a sample of supervisors, as well as relevant other stakeholders.
This study is part of the larger EU H2022-ADVANCE project, which aims to improve the mental health of vulnerable populations in Europe.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 148
Not provided
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Supervisor confidence in supporting employees with mental health conditions Change from baseline to 1-hour post-intervention, 1 month, and 3 months Confidence in supporting employees with mental health conditions will be measured among supervisors using a 6-item scale used in other trials that investigated a similar intervention. Participants will be asked to rate their degree of confidence from 1 (not confident at all) to 5 (extremely confident) for various activities that are related to the construct of supporting employee mental health. A mean score will be calculated by averaging participants' ratings across all items. Scores range from 1 to 5, with a higher score indicating more confidence.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Supervisor responsiveness to employee mental health conditions Change from baseline to 1 month and 3 months Responsiveness to mental health conditions will be measured among supervisors using a 6-item scale used in earlier trials investigating a similar intervention. Participants rate each item on a 5-point Likert scale with 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) to what extent they agree with the statement. A mean score will be calculated by averaging participants' ratings across all items. Scores range from 1 to 5, with a higher score indicating a better responsiveness.
Supervisor stigma towards mental health conditions Change from baseline to 1-hour post-intervention, 1 month, and 3 months Stigma towards mental health conditions will be measured among supervisors using the 12-item Stigma Toward Employee Depression Scale. Items are adjusted to fit a broader range of mental health conditions, instead of depression only. Participants rate each item on a 5-point Likert scale with 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) to what extent they agree with the statement. A mean score will be calculated by averaging participants' ratings across all items. Scores range from 1 to 5, with a higher score indicating more stigma.
Supervisor SelfCare Change from baseline to 1 month and 3 months SelfCare will be measured among supervisors using a construct originating from the Health-oriented Leadership framework. The full SelfCare scale consists of 3 subscales (i.e., awareness, values, and behavior), but this trial focuses only on the behaviors. From the behavior items, 3 items are chosen. Participants rate each item on a 5-point Likert scale with 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) to what extent they agree with the statement. A mean score will be calculated by averaging participants' ratings across all items. Scores range from 1 to 5, with a higher score indicating better SelfCare.
Supervisor mental health literacy Change from baseline to 1-hour post-intervention and 1 month Mental health literacy will be measured among supervisors using vignette-based questions, based on vignettes from the Mental Health Literacy (MHL) scale. Supervisors will respond to open-ended questions about how they would handle each of the workplace scenarios described in the vignettes. Responses will be scored at a later stage. Each vignette-question will receive a score from 0 to 2, with higher scores reflecting higher mental health literacy.
Implementation indicator: acceptability 1-hour post-intervention The implementation indicator of acceptability is measured post-intervention through self-reported item(s). Participants rate each item on a 5-point Likert scale with 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) to what extent they agree with the statement. Higher scores indicate higher acceptability.
Implementation indicator: appropriateness 1-hour post-intervention The implementation indicator of appropriateness is measured post-intervention through self-reported item(s). Participants rate each item on a 5-point Likert scale with 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) to what extent they agree with the statement. Higher scores indicate higher appropriateness.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
🇳🇱Amsterdam, Netherlands