Radioprotective Light-weight Caps in the Interventional Cardiology Setting

Not Applicable

Completed

Interventions: Device: 0.5mm XPF cap
Device: Standard cap
Device: 0.3mm XPF cap

Brief Summary: The primary objective of the present trial is to compare the radiation attenuation provided by XPF caps (0.5mm lead-equivalent and 0.3mm lead-equivalent) to the standard protection (fabric cap, basically no protection) as measured in % radiation attenuation) during 150 days of fluoroscopy guided cardiology interventions. The second objective is to compare the operator comfort (rated on a visual analog scale) of wearing the XPF protection caps compared to the standard fabric caps.

Detailed Description: The primary objective of the present trial is to compare the radiation attenuation provided by XPF caps (0.5mm lead-equivalent and 0.3mm lead-equivalent) to the standard protection (fabric cap, basically no protection) as measured in % radiation attenuation) during 150 days of fluoroscopy guided cardiology interventions. The second objective is to compare the operator comfort (rated on a visual analog scale) of wearing the XPF protection caps compared to the standard fabric caps.

For more information please contact Dr. Raul Herrera, MD, Director Baptist Cardiac and Vascular Institute Baptist Hospital of Miami.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria

Exclusion Criteria

Interventional Neuroradiologists and Interventional Radiologists will not be included in this study.

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
0.5mm XPF cap	0.5mm XPF cap	Interventionalist wear a XPF 0.5mm lead equivalent cap during fluoroscopy guided interventions.
standard cap	Standard cap	Interventionalist wear a standard fabric cap during fluoroscopy guided interventions.
0.3mm XPF cap	0.3mm XPF cap	Interventionalist wear a XPF 0.3mm lead equivalent cap during fluoroscopy guided interventions.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Radiation Attenuation in Percentage (%)	1 day	The null hypothesis is that the XPF 0.5mm lead-equivalent caps attenuation is equal to the XPF 0.3mm lead-equivalent and standard cap attenuations. The alternative hypothesis is that the XPF 0.5mm lead-equivalent cap attenuation is superior or inferior to the XPF 0.3mm lead-equivalent and standard cap attenuations. The groups will be compared separately and a pooled analysis, comparing XPF 0.5mm and 0.3mm combined vs. standard is also planned.The radiation protection (radiation dose reduction) expressed as a percentage was calculated by subtracting radiation measured underneath the cap from radiation measured outside the cap and then dividing this difference by the product of radiation measured outside the cap multiplied by 100.
Absolute Radiation Exposure Outside of Cap	1 day	The cumulative radiation doses were defined as the summation of all correspondent equivalent doses measured.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Operator Comfort Assessment	1 day per participant, a total of 197 operator days	After completion of the last procedure on each day, the operators were asked to rate the comfort of wearing the cap on a scale from 0 (unbearably heavy, badly fitting) to 100 (very light, well fitting).
Operator Comfort Assessment Based on Weight	1 day per participant, a total of 197 operator days	After completion of the last procedure on each day, the caps worn by the operators were weighed to assess comfort of wearing the standard cap, XPF 0.3mm and XPF 0.5mm caps. The operators were asked to rate the comfort of wearing the cap on a scale from 0 (unbearably heavy, badly fitting) to 100 (very light, well fitting).