跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04447170
NCT04447170Unknown不适用

Comparison Between Laparoscopic and Open Repair of Perforated Gastroduodenal Peptic Ulcer

Gianluca Costa13 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 200 人开始时间: 2017年1月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
发起方
入组人数
200
试验地点
13
主要终点
30-day Mortality Rate

研究概览

简要总结

Although laparoscopic repair (LR) of perforated peptic ulcers (PPUs) has long been accepted, clinical evidence comparing LR versus open repair (OR) remains lacking. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility, safety and outcome of laparoscopic gastric repair and compare it with the outcome open repair by relying on a propensity score matching statistical technique

详细描述

Despite the evolution of medical management of Gastroduodenal Peptic Ulcer (GPU), complications like bleeding and perforation are still not uncommon in clinical practice. According to the literature in average, 2-14% of peptic ulcers result in perforation, most 215 commonly occurring in females over the age of 60 and chronic NSAID, alcohol or tobacco users.

Management of perforated peptic ulcer entails resuscitation, pharmacotherapy and surgery.

Traditionally, suture with or without omental patch has been considered the 'gold standard' and still is. It is associated with shorter length of stay, lower transfusion needs and has lower morbidity as compared to gastrectomy. In 1992, it has been proposed that laparoscopy should be routinely considered in the management of perforated duodenal ulcer. Nowadays due to the advances in laparoscopic technique, many publications suggest that laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcers could be a superior choice to open repair. These is linked with the advantages of laparoscopic surgery over open surgery such as reduced postoperative pain, lower wound infection rate, decreased length of hospital stay, and earlier functional recovery

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Case Control
时间视角
Other

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients surgically treated for benign peptic ulcer perforation

排除标准

  • Age < 18 years
  • Pregnant and breastfeeding women
  • Malignant ulcer perforation
  • Gastric resection
  • Diagnostic laparoscopy/laparotomy with no further surgical procedures performed

结局指标

主要结局

30-day Mortality Rate

时间窗: 18 months

30-day Morbidity Rate

时间窗: 18 months

Morbidity defined by mean of the most used classification scoring system

次要结局

  • Operative time(18 months)
  • Conversion rate(18 months)
  • Calculation of Boey index(18 months)
  • Calculation of Mannheim Peritonitis Index(18 months)
  • Calculation of Shock index(18 months)
  • Calculation of Age-related shock index(18 months)
  • Calculation of Charlson Age-Comorbidity Index (CACI)(18 months)

研究者

发起方
Gianluca Costa
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor Investigator
主要研究者

Gianluca Costa

Professor

University of Roma La Sapienza

研究点 (13)

Loading locations...

相似试验