MedPath

Evaluation of the Impact of Corneal Width on Surgically Induced Astigmatism (SIA) and Functional Results After Bimanual 1.4 mm Microincision Cataract Surgery (B-MICS), Coaxial 1.8 mm MICS (C-MICS) and 2.4 mm Small Incision Cataract Surgery (C-SICS).

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Corneal Incision Contracture
Corneal Astigmatism
Cataract
Interventions
Procedure: Coaxial 1.8 mm microincision cataract surgery (C-MICS) with IOL implantation with an injector through the 1.8 mm wide incision created temporally.
Procedure: Bimanual 1.4 mm microincision cataract surgery (B-MICS) with IOL implantation in a "wound-assisted" technique. In bimanual MICS group a self-sealing 1.4 mm wide incision was created supratemporally
Procedure: Coaxial 2.4 mm small incision cataract surgery (C-SICS) with IOL implantation with an injector through the 2.4 mm wide incision located temporally.
Registration Number
NCT05510869
Lead Sponsor
Medical University of Lodz
Brief Summary

The aim of the study is to compare functional results and complications of 3 methods of cataract phacoemulsification: bimanual 1.4 mm cataract surgery (B-MICS), coaxial 1.8 mm cataract surgery (C-MICS) and coaxial 2.4 mm small incision cataract surgery.

Detailed Description

Reduction of the width of the corneal incision was one the main changes taking place in cataract surgery in recent years. The common use of foldable intraocular lenses (IOLs) and technological development of phaco machines allowed to reduce clear corneal incision below 3 mm. Term of Microincision Cataract Surgery (MICS) understood as cataract phacoemulsification performed with the incision width below 2 mm was defined by professor Alio in 2003. However, despite various modifications introduced in recent years, phacoemulsification still causes damage of the tissues that results in surgically induced astigmatism.

Two MICS techniques have been developed: bimanual microincision cataract surgery (B-MICS) and coaxial microincision cataract surgery (C-MICS).

In the bimanual technique cataract phacoemulsification can be performed through the main incision 1.4 mm wide due to the usage of sleeveless phaco tip (without irrigation) and irrigation chopper. The advantage of separation the irrigation from aspiration is improvement of liquid dynamics in the anterior chamber. Moreover, due to the usage of the irrigation chopper, in B-MICS it is possible to lower the mean ultrasound energy.

In coaxial technique MICS phacoemulsification is performed through the incision 1.8 mm wide with usage of phaco tip with a silicon irrigation sleeve.

The aim of the study is to compare functional results and complications of 3 methods of cataract phacoemulsification: bimanual 1.4 mm cataract surgery (B-MICS), coaxial 1.8 mm cataract surgery (C-MICS) and coaxial 2.4 mm small incision cataract surgery. Moreover, this study aimed to evaluate the impact of corneal width on best corrected visual acuity (uncorrected and corrected), surgically induced astigmatism, endothelial cell loss, intraocular pressure, anterior segment of the eye and central retinal thickness.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
90
Inclusion Criteria
  • lens opacities which were an indication for cataract surgery and absence of exclusion criteria,
  • cataract sclerosis grade from II to IV in Lens Opacities Classification System LOCS III scale (The Lens Opacities Classification System III).
Exclusion Criteria
  • history of ocular surgery, ocular trauma,
  • congenital ocular malformations, amblyopia,
  • corneal disorders (including corneal opacities and scars),
  • best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ≥ 0.9,
  • preoperative endothelial cell density <1500 cells/mm2,
  • history of uveitis, diabetic retinopathy,
  • retinal and macular disorders,
  • eventful phacoemulsification
  • presence of other diseases that could affect the postoperative visual outcomes.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
C-MICS 1.8 mmCoaxial 1.8 mm microincision cataract surgery (C-MICS) with IOL implantation with an injector through the 1.8 mm wide incision created temporally.coaxial 1.8 mm cataract surgery (C-MICS)
B-MICS 1.4 mmBimanual 1.4 mm microincision cataract surgery (B-MICS) with IOL implantation in a "wound-assisted" technique. In bimanual MICS group a self-sealing 1.4 mm wide incision was created supratemporallybimanual 1.4 mm cataract surgery (B-MICS)
C-SICS 2.4 mmCoaxial 2.4 mm small incision cataract surgery (C-SICS) with IOL implantation with an injector through the 2.4 mm wide incision located temporally.coaxial 2.4 mm small incision cataract surgery (C-SICS)
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
keratometry36 months

measured in diopters (D)

autorefractometry36 months

measured in diopters (D)

central corneal thickness (CCT)36 months

measured with Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography (AS-OCT), unit of measure: µm (micrometers).

peripheral nasal corneal thickness36 months

measured with Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography (AS-OCT), unit of measure: µm (micrometers)

the best uncorrected visual acuity36 months

examined with digital Snellen chart, measured in decimal scale

endothelial cell density (ECD)36 months

measured in endothelial cells/mm2

intraocular pressure (IOP)36 months

measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg)

peripheral temporal corneal thickness36 months

measured at the main incision site with Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography (AS-OCT), unit of measure: µm (micrometers)

parafoveal retinal thickness36 months

measured with Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), unit of measure: µm (micrometers)

the best corrected visual acuity36 months

examined with digital Snellen chart, measured in decimal scale

anterior chamber depth (ACD)36 months

measured with Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography (AS-OCT) in mm (milimeters).

length of the clear corneal incision36 months

the chord length measured with Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography (AS-OCT), unit of measure: µm (micrometers)

the white-to-white (WTW) distance - the horizontal corneal diameter36 months

measured with Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography (AS-OCT, unit of measure: mm (milimeters).

anterior chamber angle36 months

measured with Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography (AS-OCT) in horizontal scan, unit of measure: degrees

central foveal thickness (CFT)36 months

measured with Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), unit of measure: µm (micrometers)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
surgically induced astigmatism SIA36 months

measured in dioptres (D) - three different methods were used for calculation of surgically induced astigmatism (SIA): vector analysis method, vector decomposition method (C90), Naeser's polar values method (dKP-90)

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath