The Learning Effects of Attentional Strategy on Dual-task Walking in Patients With Parkinson's Disease: Behavioral Performance and Neural Plasticity
- Conditions
- Parkinson Disease
- Interventions
- Behavioral: [year1] dual-task training with task priority strategyBehavioral: [year2-3] dual-task training with internal and external focus
- Registration Number
- NCT03895125
- Lead Sponsor
- National Taiwan University Hospital
- Brief Summary
\[year1\]
1. To compare the effects of dual-task training with two different task priority instruction in people with Parkinson's disease and healthy controls on dual-task weight shifting performances.
2. Investigate the changes of brain activities and functional connectivity after dual-task training with different task priority instructions.
\[year 2-3\]
To investigate the learning effects of walking with internal/external focus on walking automaticity and brain plasticity in dual-task walking training for PD patients with/without freezing of gait.
- Detailed Description
Postural-suprapostural task is defined as postural control takes place while another concurrent task is being performed, belonging to dual-task paradigms. Effective dual-task training is important to patients with Parkinson disease (PD), because they often lose balance and fall in dual-task conditions. Attentional strategy includes 1) task-priority between postural and suprapostural tasks and 2) internal and external focus for the postural task, which is the critical factor for both dual-task control and motor learning. However, the appropriateness of attentional strategy has not been investigated in dual-task training in patients with PD. Besides, there is lack of neural evidence of brain plasticity for previous studies about dual-task training in patients with PD. With the uses of EEG, EMG and behavioral measures, the purpose of this 3-year research project is to investigate the differences in performance quality and intrinsic neural mechanisms of dual-task training in PD, by adopting task-priority strategy and internal/external strategy during weight-shifting and walking. In the first year, the investigators will characterize task-priority effect (posture-priority vs. supraposture-priority) on dual-task training, with a special focus on modulation of brain plasticity and muscle activity patterns in weight-shifting posture for patients with PD. In the second and third years, the learning effects of walking internal/external focus on walking automaticity and brain plasticity will be investigated in dual-task walking training for PD patients with/without freezing of gait. Besides, the transfer effects of dual-task learning will be also investigated on medication "off" state. The present project is expected to have significant contributions not only to gain a better insight to neural correlates of dual-task training with different attentional strategies under weight-shifting and walking, but to optimize treatment strategy for PD patients with balance or dual-tasking disturbances.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- TERMINATED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 1
Not provided
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description [year1] healthy control group [year1] dual-task training with task priority strategy - [year1] PD group [year1] dual-task training with task priority strategy - [year2-3] non-freezer [year2-3] dual-task training with internal and external focus - [year2-3] freezer [year2-3] dual-task training with internal and external focus -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method postural performance about 36 seconds for each trial for a total of 25 minutes measuring the amount of body weight shifting (unit: kg)
Gait symmetry about 10-20 seconds for each trial collecting single leg supporting time of right and left leg by using the GAITRite
suprapostural performance about 36 seconds for each trial for a total of 25 minutes measuring the rotation angle of box on the hand (unit: degree)
Walking speed about 10-20 seconds for each trial collecting by using the GAITRite electronic walkway (CIR systems, Inc. ,USA) 24 inches(61cm) wide and 192 inches (488cm, 16ft) long, total 18,432 sensor (unit: m/s)
Cadence about 10-20 seconds for each trial collecting by using the GAITRite (unit: step/s)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method electroencephalography (EEG) about 36 seconds for each trial for a total of 25 minutes to collect the brain activity (unit: uV)
electromyography (EMG) about 36 seconds for each trial for a total of 25 minutes to collect the muscle activity (unit: mV)
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
National Taiwan University Hospital
🇨🇳Taipei, Taiwan